PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVLV vs. AVMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVLV vs. AVMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLV achieves a 23.60% return, which is significantly higher than AVMA's 11.36% return.


AVLV

1D
1.01%
1M
2.49%
6M
14.26%
YTD
23.60%
1Y
37.90%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.98%

AVMA

1D
0.72%
1M
0.76%
6M
7.09%
YTD
11.36%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
14.71%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$110.88M$105.15M$154.25M
$747.07K$736.92K$601.00K

AVLV vs. AVMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
23.60%15.12%17.49%10.88%
AVMA
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
11.36%16.72%10.01%8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLV and AVMA is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.92

The correlation between AVLV and AVMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVLV vs. AVMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AVMA
AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVLV vs. AVMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVLVAVMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.42

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.96

3.32

+2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.13

13.78

+10.34

AVLV vs. AVMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is higher than the AVMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLV and AVMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVLV vs. AVMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLV drawdown since its inception was -19.50%, which is greater than AVMA's maximum drawdown of -11.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLV and AVMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLVAVMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.50%

-11.81%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-6.40%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.50%

-11.81%

-7.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.09%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-1.51%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.54%

+0.04%

Volatility

AVLV vs. AVMA - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) and Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) have volatilities of 2.53% and 2.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVLVAVMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

2.53%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

7.67%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.35%

9.48%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.17%

10.28%

+6.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

10.28%

+6.89%

AVLV vs. AVMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than AVMA's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVLV vs. AVMA - Dividend Comparison

AVLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than AVMA's 2.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.05%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%
AVMA
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
2.01%2.21%2.28%1.11%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, AVLV and AVMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AVMA has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to AVLV (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLV dropped -19.50% vs AVMA's -11.81%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 21.00% vs 14.71% for AVMA. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 14.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for AVMA.

AVMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.05% for AVLV.

AVLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AVMA is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLV and 0.21% for AVMA.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVLV and AVMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer