PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVMA vs. OCIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVMA vs. OCIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) and ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVMA achieves a 10.12% return, which is significantly higher than OCIO's 7.89% return.


AVMA

1D
-0.99%
1M
0.64%
YTD
10.12%
6M
9.66%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCIO

1D
-1.91%
1M
0.56%
YTD
7.89%
6M
7.37%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
13.27%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVMA vs. OCIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVMA
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
10.12%16.72%10.01%8.36%
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
7.89%12.68%12.76%5.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AVMA and OCIO is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.89

The correlation between AVMA and OCIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVMA vs. OCIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVMA
AVMA Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVMA Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
AVMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVMA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

OCIO
OCIO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OCIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OCIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
OCIO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
OCIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
OCIO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVMA vs. OCIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) and ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVMAOCIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.70

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.86

11.54

+3.32

AVMA vs. OCIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the OCIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVMA and OCIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVMA vs. OCIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVMA drawdown since its inception was -11.81%, smaller than the maximum OCIO drawdown of -24.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVMA and OCIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVMAOCIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.81%

-24.21%

+12.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.40%

-6.98%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.91%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.54%

-4.42%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.63%

-0.11%

Volatility

AVMA vs. OCIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF (AVMA) is 3.43%, while ClearShares OCIO ETF (OCIO) has a volatility of 5.12%. This indicates that AVMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OCIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVMAOCIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

5.12%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.61%

8.93%

-1.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.41%

10.68%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

10.79%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

11.43%

-1.07%

AVMA vs. OCIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVMA has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than OCIO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVMA vs. OCIO - Dividend Comparison

AVMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, less than OCIO's 9.61% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVMA
Avantis Moderate Allocation ETF
3.03%2.21%2.28%1.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OCIO
ClearShares OCIO ETF
9.61%10.27%1.87%2.32%3.21%2.83%2.90%2.22%0.01%1.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, AVMA and OCIO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

OCIO has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to AVMA (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVMA dropped -11.81% vs OCIO's -24.21%.

On 1-year performance, AVMA leads with 22.59% vs 18.77% for OCIO. On fees, AVMA is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, AVMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVMA has performed better with a 22.59% return vs 18.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVMA is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for OCIO.

OCIO has the higher dividend yield at 9.61%, compared with 3.03% for AVMA.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and ClearShares LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for AVMA and 0.61% for OCIO.

AVMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVMA and OCIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer