AVLC vs. TDVG

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AVLC (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVLC returned 25.88% vs 19.23% for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AVLC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

AVLC vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVLC achieves a 13.99% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's 10.93% return.

AVLC

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 0.03%
• 6M: 10.58%
• YTD: 13.99%
• 1Y: 25.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.95%

TDVG

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 9.09%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 1Y: 19.23%
• 3Y*: 14.55%
• 5Y*: 10.00%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	$6.08M	$5.55M	$6.35M
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	$2.11M	$3.07M	$2.63M

AVLC vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	13.99%	17.57%	22.82%	11.76%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	10.93%	14.80%	13.45%	10.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AVLC and TDVG is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.85

The correlation between AVLC and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVLC vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVLC	TDVG
Technology	33.9%	27.4%
Financial Services	13.7%	19.3%
Industrials	11.7%	14.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.2%	6.7%
Communication Services	7.8%	0.8%
Healthcare	7.5%	12.8%
Energy	6.2%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	6.6%
Utilities	2.3%	3.2%
Basic Materials	2.2%	2.8%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.5%

Return for Risk

AVLC vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVLC

AVLC Risk / Return Rank: 80
AVLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AVLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AVLC Omega Ratio Rank: 75
AVLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
AVLC Martin Ratio Rank: 88

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 80
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVLC vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVLC	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.87	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	2.69	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.34	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.51	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	10.48	+2.53

AVLC vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVLC and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVLC vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVLC drawdown since its inception was -19.64%, roughly equal to the maximum TDVG drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVLC and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVLC	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.64%	-19.20%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.00%	-7.24%	-0.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.02%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.92%	-0.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-3.67%	+1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.83%	1.73%	+0.10%

Volatility

AVLC vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (AVLC) has a higher volatility of 3.58% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.20%. This indicates that AVLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVLC	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.58%	2.20%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	7.30%	+3.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.45%	9.74%	+3.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.68%	13.87%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.68%	13.81%	+1.87%

AVLC vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVLC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVLC vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

AVLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than TDVG's 0.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AVLC Avantis U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF	0.82%	0.92%	1.09%	0.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.96%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVLC and TDVG in my portfolio?

AVLC and TDVG have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVLC or TDVG?

AVLC has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to TDVG (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVLC dropped -19.64% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, AVLC or TDVG?

On 1-year performance, AVLC leads with 25.88% vs 19.23% for TDVG. On fees, AVLC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVLC or TDVG?

Over the 1-year period, AVLC has performed better with a 25.88% return vs 19.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVLC or TDVG?

AVLC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVLC or TDVG?

TDVG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.82% for AVLC.

What is the main difference between AVLC and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AVLC and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TDVG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.