AVL vs. WTIU
AVL (Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares) and WTIU (MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AVL is actively managed, while WTIU is passively managed. Over the past year, AVL returned 167.73% vs 103.25% for WTIU. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. AVL charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for WTIU.
Performance
AVL vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVL achieves a 72.10% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 91.57% return.
AVL
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 29.70%
- YTD
- 72.10%
- 6M
- 38.64%
- 1Y
- 167.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WTIU
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- -7.74%
- YTD
- 91.57%
- 6M
- 66.33%
- 1Y
- 103.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVL vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | 72.10% | 54.38% | 39.90% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 91.57% | -17.13% | -29.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVL and WTIU is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | -0.01 |
The correlation between AVL and WTIU shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVL vs. WTIU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVL
WTIU
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
AVL
WTIU
-
Basic Materials
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Communication Services
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Cyclical
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Consumer Defensive
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Energy
AVL
-
WTIU
Financial Services
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Healthcare
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Industrials
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Real Estate
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Utilities
AVL
-
WTIU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVL vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank
AVL
WTIU
AVL vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVL | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.54 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.54 | 2.00 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.14 | 2.65 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.02 | 6.55 | +0.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVL | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.54 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.18 | -0.09 | +1.27 |
Drawdowns
AVL vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVL and WTIU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVL | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.63% | -75.73% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.69% | -39.11% | -14.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -75.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -32.10% | +31.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.38% | -39.19% | +15.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.00% | 15.83% | +8.17% |
Volatility
AVL vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) is 23.46%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 27.06%. This indicates that AVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVL | WTIU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.46% | 27.06% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.68% | 54.98% | +6.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.76% | 67.51% | +18.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 105.25% | 70.62% | +34.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.25% | 70.62% | +34.63% |
AVL vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVL vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison
AVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.16%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AVL Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares | 17.16% | 29.04% | 0.22% |
WTIU MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVL and WTIU have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTIU has higher volatility (27.06%) compared to AVL (23.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVL dropped -70.63% vs WTIU's -75.73%.
On 1-year performance, AVL leads with 167.73% vs 103.25% for WTIU. On fees, WTIU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, AVL has been the lower-risk option at 23.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVL has performed better with a 167.73% return vs 103.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
WTIU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for AVL.
AVL has the higher dividend yield at 17.16%, compared with 0.00% for WTIU.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for AVL and 0.95% for WTIU.
AVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVL and WTIU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer