PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVL vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVL vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVL vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
-24.89%54.38%39.90%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
2.59%425.05%-28.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVL achieves a -24.89% return, which is significantly lower than NUGT's 2.59% return.


AVL

1D
10.78%
1M
-8.27%
YTD
-24.89%
6M
-24.09%
1Y
150.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
14.02%
1M
-39.84%
YTD
2.59%
6M
22.25%
1Y
204.10%
3Y*
67.13%
5Y*
27.67%
10Y*
-1.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AVL vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.23% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AVL vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVL
AVL Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
AVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVL Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVL Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVL vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVLNUGTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.57

2.25

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.34

2.36

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.92

-1.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.32

12.64

-6.32

AVL vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVL Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVL and NUGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVLNUGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

2.25

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

-0.33

+0.69

Correlation

The correlation between AVL and NUGT is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AVL vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

AVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.32%, more than NUGT's 0.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
39.32%29.04%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares
0.29%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Drawdowns

AVL vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVL and NUGT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.63%

-99.97%

+29.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.69%

-53.58%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.70%

-99.76%

+51.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.50%

-91.43%

+66.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.98%

16.61%

+6.37%

Volatility

AVL vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) is 24.78%, while Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X Shares (NUGT) has a volatility of 36.87%. This indicates that AVL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVLNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.78%

36.87%

-12.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.14%

77.23%

-12.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.35%

91.23%

+5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.58%

70.70%

+36.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.58%

89.95%

+17.63%