PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVL vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVL vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVL achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -37.41% return.


AVL

1D
0.96%
1M
-19.32%
YTD
4.18%
6M
1.69%
1Y
55.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
-7.97%
1M
-25.90%
YTD
-37.41%
6M
-43.27%
1Y
55.32%
3Y*
51.47%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
-12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVL vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
4.18%54.38%38.75%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
-37.41%425.05%-24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AVL and NUGT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.21

AVL vs. NUGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVL
NUGT

Technology

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AVL
100.0%
NUGT

-

Basic Materials

AVL

-

NUGT
100.0%

Communication Services

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Consumer Defensive

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Energy

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Financial Services

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Healthcare

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Industrials

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Real Estate

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Utilities

AVL

-

NUGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVL vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVL
AVL Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
AVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
AVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVL Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVL vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVLNUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

0.88

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

2.07

+0.10

AVL vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVL Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is comparable to the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVL and NUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVL vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVL drawdown since its inception was -70.63%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVL and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVLNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.63%

-99.97%

+29.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.69%

-63.43%

+9.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.05%

-99.85%

+59.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.84%

-91.53%

+67.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.46%

26.81%

-1.35%

Volatility

AVL vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares (AVL) has a higher volatility of 45.25% compared to Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) at 35.78%. This indicates that AVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NUGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVLNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.25%

35.78%

+9.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.26%

80.55%

-13.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.85%

94.63%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

107.67%

73.02%

+34.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.67%

87.99%

+19.68%

AVL vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVL has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVL vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

AVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.48%, more than NUGT's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AVL
Direxion Daily AVGO Bull 2X Shares
28.48%29.04%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
0.62%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVL and NUGT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVL has higher volatility (45.25%) compared to NUGT (35.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVL dropped -70.63% vs NUGT's -99.97%.

On 1-year performance, NUGT leads with 55.32% vs 55.05% for AVL. On fees, AVL is cheaper at 1.04% per year. On volatility, NUGT has been the lower-risk option at 35.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NUGT has performed better with a 55.32% return vs 55.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVL is cheaper with a 1.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.

AVL has the higher dividend yield at 28.48%, compared with 0.62% for NUGT.

AVL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for AVL and 1.13% for NUGT.

AVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVL and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer