PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVHNY vs. GSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVHNY vs. GSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVHNY achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than GSL's 10.52% return.


AVHNY

1D
0.00%
1M
2.08%
YTD
2.08%
6M
68.42%
1Y
68.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSL

1D
-0.11%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
10.52%
6M
7.33%
1Y
59.86%
3Y*
36.68%
5Y*
27.62%
10Y*
16.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVHNY vs. GSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVHNY
Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR
2.08%76.45%0.00%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
10.52%73.47%-10.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AVHNY and GSL is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2024

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVHNY:

$8.61B

GSL:

$1.37B

EPS

AVHNY:

$3.21

GSL:

$10.76

PE Ratio

AVHNY:

8.20

GSL:

3.49

PEG Ratio

AVHNY:

0.46

GSL:

0.13

PS Ratio

AVHNY:

0.72

GSL:

1.75

PB Ratio

AVHNY:

1.51

GSL:

0.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVHNY:

$11.98B

GSL:

$770.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVHNY:

$3.73B

GSL:

$409.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

AVHNY:

$2.52B

GSL:

$528.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVHNY vs. GSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVHNY
AVHNY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AVHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
AVHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

GSL
GSL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVHNY vs. GSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVHNYGSLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.07

2.17

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

25.65

2.87

+22.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

26.45

1.35

+25.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

25.93

3.52

+22.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

43.15

10.92

+32.23

AVHNY vs. GSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVHNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the GSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVHNY and GSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVHNYGSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.07

2.17

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.04

0.01

+1.03

Drawdowns

AVHNY vs. GSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVHNY drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum GSL drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVHNY and GSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVHNYGSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-95.26%

+92.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-17.09%

+14.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-9.88%

+9.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-58.80%

+58.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

5.50%

-3.91%

Volatility

AVHNY vs. GSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) is 2.05%, while Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) has a volatility of 10.31%. This indicates that AVHNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVHNYGSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

10.31%

-8.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.10%

20.62%

+29.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.52%

27.66%

+37.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.13%

37.51%

+21.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.13%

54.83%

+4.30%

Dividends

AVHNY vs. GSL - Dividend Comparison

AVHNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than GSL's 6.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVHNY
Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR
3.68%1.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.39%6.06%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.69%

Financials

AVHNY vs. GSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR and Global Ship Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B202120222023202420252026
2.91B
198.08M
(AVHNY) Total Revenue
(GSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVHNY vs. GSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR and Global Ship Lease, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
14.1%
53.7%
Portfolio components
AVHNY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a gross profit of 409.06M and revenue of 2.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

GSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.27M and revenue of 198.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.

AVHNY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported an operating income of 379.86M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

GSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.42M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

AVHNY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR reported a net income of 316.94M and revenue of 2.91B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

GSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 93.83M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in a net margin of 47.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVHNY and GSL have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSL has higher volatility (10.31%) compared to AVHNY (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVHNY dropped -2.64% vs GSL's -95.26%.

GSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVHNY and GSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer