AVGV vs. POW
AVGV (Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGV is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVGV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.
Performance
AVGV vs. POW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGV achieves a 17.20% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.
AVGV
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- YTD
- 17.20%
- 1Y
- 30.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
POW
- 1D
- -3.60%
- 1M
- -8.76%
- 6M
- 31.71%
- YTD
- 38.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGV vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 17.20% | 3.60% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 38.93% | -1.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGV and POW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGV vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank
AVGV
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AVGV vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.46 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGV vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGV drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGV and POW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.03% | -18.37% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -18.37% | +16.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -4.33% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | — | — |
Volatility
AVGV vs. POW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGV | POW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.32% | 32.94% | -19.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 32.94% | -18.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.93% | 32.94% | -18.01% |
AVGV vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGV vs. POW - Dividend Comparison
AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGV Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.98% | 2.32% | 1.14% |
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.14% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGV and POW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.14% for POW.
AVGV is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for AVGV and 0.75% for POW.
Find the right allocation for AVGV and POW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer