PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGU vs. NVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGU vs. NVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGU achieves a 6.01% return, which is significantly higher than NVD's -34.27% return.


AVGU

1D
1.04%
1M
15.33%
6M
17.74%
YTD
6.01%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
39.51%

NVD

1D
-5.81%
1M
-14.55%
6M
-34.17%
YTD
-34.27%
1Y
-48.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-78.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.09M$2.95M$5.92M
$439.12M$390.53M$343.34M

AVGU vs. NVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVGU and NVD is -0.55, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

-0.55

The correlation between AVGU and NVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGU vs. NVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVGU
AVGU Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AVGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGU Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

NVD
NVD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
NVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVGU vs. NVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGUNVDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.92

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

-0.82

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.19

-1.46

+2.66

AVGU vs. NVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is higher than the NVD Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGU and NVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGU vs. NVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum NVD drawdown of -99.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and NVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGUNVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.30%

-99.26%

+45.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.30%

-59.80%

+6.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.17%

-99.11%

+59.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.90%

-82.51%

+59.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.67%

33.42%

-4.75%

Volatility

AVGU vs. NVD - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) have volatilities of 24.87% and 24.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGUNVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.87%

24.57%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

70.09%

57.71%

+12.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

95.06%

73.34%

+21.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.37%

92.04%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.37%

92.04%

+1.33%

AVGU vs. NVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AVGU and NVD have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

AVGU vs. NVD - Dividend Comparison

AVGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.99%.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVGU
GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF
17.99%11.83%8.68%15.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGU and NVD have a correlation of -0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGU has higher volatility (24.87%) compared to NVD (24.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGU dropped -53.30% vs NVD's -99.26%.

On 1-year performance, AVGU leads with 34.11% vs -48.83% for NVD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, NVD has been the lower-risk option at 24.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGU has performed better with a 34.11% return vs -48.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVGU and NVD have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

NVD has the higher dividend yield at 17.99%, compared with 0.00% for AVGU.

AVGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVD is Inverse Equities.

AVGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.36 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGU and NVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer