PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGO vs. CW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVGO vs. CW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than CW's 37.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed CW with an annualized return of 40.96%, while CW has yielded a comparatively lower 25.12% annualized return.


AVGO

1D
-0.91%
1M
-8.33%
YTD
10.62%
6M
6.58%
1Y
50.41%
3Y*
67.17%
5Y*
55.09%
10Y*
40.96%

CW

1D
0.10%
1M
0.93%
YTD
37.55%
6M
38.99%
1Y
60.13%
3Y*
63.08%
5Y*
43.15%
10Y*
25.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGO vs. CW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
10.62%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
37.55%55.66%59.73%33.98%21.03%19.86%-16.83%38.70%-15.79%24.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGO and CW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVGO:

$1.86T

CW:

$28.09B

EPS

AVGO:

$6.01

CW:

$13.64

PE Ratio

AVGO:

63.58

CW:

55.58

PEG Ratio

AVGO:

0.79

CW:

3.03

PS Ratio

AVGO:

24.70

CW:

7.88

PB Ratio

AVGO:

21.24

CW:

10.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVGO:

$75.47B

CW:

$3.61B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVGO:

$50.53B

CW:

$1.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVGO:

$41.76B

CW:

$745.31M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGO vs. CW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

CW
CW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CW Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CW Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGO vs. CW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGOCWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

4.66

-2.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

13.53

-9.42

AVGO vs. CW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the CW Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGO and CW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGO vs. CW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum CW drawdown of -59.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and CW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGOCWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.30%

-59.19%

+10.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.67%

-12.97%

-15.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.15%

-27.21%

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.15%

-27.21%

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.30%

-48.73%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.66%

0.00%

-20.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-13.89%

+5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.30%

4.46%

+7.84%

Volatility

AVGO vs. CW - Volatility Comparison

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a higher volatility of 20.53% compared to Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) at 10.40%. This indicates that AVGO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGOCWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.53%

10.40%

+10.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.04%

26.00%

+9.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.57%

32.95%

+12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.39%

27.89%

+15.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.52%

30.31%

+9.21%

Dividends

AVGO vs. CW - Dividend Comparison

AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than CW's 0.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.65%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
0.13%0.17%0.23%0.35%0.45%0.51%0.58%0.47%0.59%0.46%0.53%0.76%

Financials

AVGO vs. CW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadcom Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.19B
913.69M
(AVGO) Total Revenue
(CW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVGO vs. CW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Broadcom Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
67.2%
36.3%
Portfolio components
AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

CW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a gross profit of 331.48M and revenue of 913.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.3%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

CW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported an operating income of 160.42M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.

CW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Curtiss-Wright Corporation reported a net income of 128.19M and revenue of 913.69M, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGO and CW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (20.53%) compared to CW (10.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs CW's -59.19%.

CW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGO and CW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer