PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVES vs. UEVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVES vs. UEVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than UEVM's 5.73% return.


AVES

1D
0.64%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
11.39%
6M
13.83%
1Y
28.23%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
10Y*

UEVM

1D
0.33%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
5.73%
6M
5.73%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
16.44%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVES vs. UEVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
11.39%30.49%4.50%16.79%-16.04%1.32%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
5.73%22.74%11.92%17.41%-14.60%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between AVES and UEVM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021

0.92

The correlation between AVES and UEVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVES vs. UEVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVES
UEVM

Financial Services

25.3%
17.7%

Technology

21.4%
15.5%

Industrials

13.3%
8.7%

Basic Materials

9.8%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.0%

Communication Services

5.3%
2.0%

Energy

4.0%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
5.5%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.8%

Healthcare

2.1%
4.4%

Utilities

1.7%
4.1%

Financial Services

AVES
25.3%
UEVM
17.7%

Technology

AVES
21.4%
UEVM
15.5%

Industrials

AVES
13.3%
UEVM
8.7%

Basic Materials

AVES
9.8%
UEVM
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

AVES
9.6%
UEVM
5.0%

Communication Services

AVES
5.3%
UEVM
2.0%

Energy

AVES
4.0%
UEVM
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

AVES
3.2%
UEVM
5.5%

Real Estate

AVES
2.4%
UEVM
2.8%

Healthcare

AVES
2.1%
UEVM
4.4%

Utilities

AVES
1.7%
UEVM
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVES vs. UEVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

UEVM
UEVM Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
UEVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEVM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
UEVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEVM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVES vs. UEVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVESUEVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.98

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

6.60

+1.46

AVES vs. UEVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVES Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the UEVM Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVES and UEVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVESUEVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59

1.25

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.31

+0.23

Drawdowns

AVES vs. UEVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum UEVM drawdown of -45.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and UEVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVESUEVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.40%

-45.44%

+18.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-9.79%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-18.88%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-5.11%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-11.66%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.93%

+0.58%

Volatility

AVES vs. UEVM - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) at 5.55%. This indicates that AVES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVESUEVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

5.55%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.35%

12.57%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.90%

15.53%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.12%

15.96%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

18.41%

-1.29%

AVES vs. UEVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than UEVM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVES vs. UEVM - Dividend Comparison

AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.95%, less than UEVM's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.95%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UEVM
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF
3.14%4.02%5.65%4.71%3.46%4.49%2.19%2.79%2.34%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVES and UEVM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVES has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to UEVM (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs UEVM's -45.44%.

On 3-year performance, AVES leads with 18.05% vs 16.44% for UEVM. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, UEVM has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVES has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 16.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.

UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 2.95% for AVES.

AVES is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UEVM is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.45% for UEVM.

AVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVES and UEVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer