AVES vs. TJUN
AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) and TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) are both exchange-traded funds - AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while TJUN is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVES charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TJUN.
Performance
AVES vs. TJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than TJUN's 5.26% return.
AVES
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TJUN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 5.26%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVES vs. TJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 16.79% | 14.69% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 5.26% | 11.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVES and TJUN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVES vs. TJUN — Risk / Return Rank
AVES
TJUN
AVES vs. TJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVES | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.90 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVES | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 2.49 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
AVES vs. TJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than TJUN's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and TJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVES | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -4.47% | -22.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | 0.00% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.73% | -0.60% | -7.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | — | — |
Volatility
AVES vs. TJUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVES | TJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 7.55% | +9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 7.55% | +9.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 7.55% | +9.43% |
AVES vs. TJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than TJUN's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVES vs. TJUN - Dividend Comparison
AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, while TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.81% | 3.17% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% |
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVES and TJUN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.
AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.
AVES is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while TJUN is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: American Century and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.95% for TJUN.
Find the right allocation for AVES and TJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer