PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVES vs. GUNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVES vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AVES having a 15.51% return and GUNR slightly higher at 15.74%.


AVES

1D
0.32%
1M
0.12%
YTD
15.51%
6M
18.20%
1Y
31.51%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
10Y*

GUNR

1D
1.19%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
15.74%
6M
17.02%
1Y
32.88%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
11.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVES vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
15.51%30.49%4.50%16.79%-16.04%0.95%
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
15.74%30.03%-8.37%-2.40%14.83%8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between AVES and GUNR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021

0.67

The correlation between AVES and GUNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AVES vs. GUNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVES
GUNR

Financial Services

25.3%
2.7%

Technology

21.4%
0.5%

Industrials

13.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

9.8%
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
0.2%

Communication Services

5.3%
1.7%

Energy

4.0%
29.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
11.5%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.2%

Healthcare

2.1%

-

Utilities

1.7%
4.0%

Financial Services

AVES
25.3%
GUNR
2.7%

Technology

AVES
21.4%
GUNR
0.5%

Industrials

AVES
13.3%
GUNR
2.3%

Basic Materials

AVES
9.8%
GUNR
45.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AVES
9.6%
GUNR
0.2%

Communication Services

AVES
5.3%
GUNR
1.7%

Energy

AVES
4.0%
GUNR
29.3%

Consumer Defensive

AVES
3.2%
GUNR
11.5%

Real Estate

AVES
2.4%
GUNR
0.2%

Healthcare

AVES
2.1%
GUNR

-

Utilities

AVES
1.7%
GUNR
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVES vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVES
AVES Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GUNR
GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVES vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVESGUNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.38

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

4.40

-2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.40

16.53

-8.13

AVES vs. GUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVES Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the GUNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVES and GUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVES vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, smaller than the maximum GUNR drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and GUNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVESGUNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.40%

-45.64%

+18.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-7.77%

-5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.50%

-19.59%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-5.39%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.70%

-10.39%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.06%

+1.50%

Volatility

AVES vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) at 5.11%. This indicates that AVES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVESGUNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

5.11%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.88%

13.13%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

15.69%

+2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

19.06%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.20%

20.44%

-3.24%

AVES vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVES vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison

AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than GUNR's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVES
Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF
3.53%3.17%4.09%3.96%3.70%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GUNR
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund
2.31%2.81%3.39%3.55%4.12%3.61%2.79%3.25%3.27%2.00%1.73%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVES and GUNR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVES has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to GUNR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs GUNR's -45.64%.

On 3-year performance, AVES leads with 19.19% vs 12.40% for GUNR. On fees, AVES is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVES has performed better with a 19.19% return vs 12.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVES is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.31% for GUNR.

AVES is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GUNR is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.46% for GUNR.

GUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVES and GUNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer