AVES vs. AVXC

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) and AVXC (Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while AVXC is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVES returned 29.85% vs 53.33% for AVXC. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVES charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVXC.

Performance

AVES vs. AVXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 15.51% return, which is significantly lower than AVXC's 31.49% return.

AVES

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 15.51%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 29.85%
• 3Y*: 19.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVXC

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 3.02%
• YTD: 31.49%
• 6M: 35.68%
• 1Y: 53.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVES vs. AVXC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	15.51%	30.49%	0.82%
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	31.49%	31.45%	-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AVES and AVXC is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.87

The correlation between AVES and AVXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVES vs. AVXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVES	AVXC
Financial Services	25.3%	20.2%
Technology	21.4%	38.2%
Industrials	13.3%	10.0%
Basic Materials	9.8%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	5.5%
Communication Services	5.3%	3.7%
Energy	4.0%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	2.9%
Real Estate	2.4%	1.5%
Healthcare	2.1%	2.3%
Utilities	1.7%	2.8%

Return for Risk

AVES vs. AVXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVES

AVES Risk / Return Rank: 54
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 55

AVXC

AVXC Risk / Return Rank: 84
AVXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AVXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
AVXC Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AVXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
AVXC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVES vs. AVXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVES	AVXC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	2.45	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.22	3.13	-0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.45	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.82	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.40	14.82	-6.42

AVES vs. AVXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVES Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is lower than the AVXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVES and AVXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVES vs. AVXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than AVXC's maximum drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and AVXC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVES	AVXC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.40%	-20.44%	-6.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-14.04%	+1.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-3.33%	+0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.70%	-3.81%	-3.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.61%	-0.05%

Volatility

AVES vs. AVXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) is 8.89%, while Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF (AVXC) has a volatility of 11.39%. This indicates that AVES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVES	AVXC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.89%	11.39%	-2.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	19.80%	-3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.34%	21.88%	-3.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	19.26%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	19.26%	-2.06%

AVES vs. AVXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AVXC's 0.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVES vs. AVXC - Dividend Comparison

AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than AVXC's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	3.53%	3.17%	4.09%	3.96%	3.70%	0.62%
AVXC Avantis Emerging Markets ex-China Equity ETF	2.06%	1.97%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVES and AVXC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, AVES and AVXC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AVES or AVXC?

AVXC has higher volatility (11.39%) compared to AVES (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs AVXC's -20.44%.

Which ETF is better, AVES or AVXC?

On 1-year performance, AVXC leads with 53.33% vs 29.85% for AVES. On fees, AVXC is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, AVES has been the lower-risk option at 8.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVES or AVXC?

Over the 1-year period, AVXC has performed better with a 53.33% return vs 29.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVES or AVXC?

AVXC is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVES or AVXC?

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 2.06% for AVXC.

What is the main difference between AVES and AVXC?

AVES is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVXC is Emerging Markets Diversified. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.33% for AVXC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.