AVES vs. AVLV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) and AVLV (Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while AVLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value Index. AVES is actively managed, while AVLV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVES returned 20.73%/yr vs 23.23%/yr for AVLV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVES charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AVLV.

Performance

AVES vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVES achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 20.64% return.

AVES

• 1D: -1.23%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 6M: 19.15%
• 1Y: 37.50%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AVLV

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 5.75%
• YTD: 20.64%
• 6M: 22.01%
• 1Y: 38.77%
• 3Y*: 23.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVES vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	16.79%	30.49%	4.50%	16.79%	-16.04%	1.32%
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	20.64%	15.12%	17.49%	17.43%	-5.53%	8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between AVES and AVLV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021	0.63

The correlation between AVES and AVLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVES vs. AVLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVES	AVLV
Financial Services	25.3%	16.3%
Technology	21.4%	17.2%
Industrials	13.3%	15.4%
Basic Materials	9.8%	2.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	14.1%
Communication Services	5.3%	6.9%
Energy	4.0%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	7.7%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.1%
Healthcare	2.1%	5.6%
Utilities	1.7%	0.3%

Return for Risk

AVES vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVES

AVES Risk / Return Rank: 61
AVES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
AVES Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
AVES Omega Ratio Rank: 65
AVES Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AVES Martin Ratio Rank: 60

AVLV

AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 91
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVES vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVES	AVLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	3.18	-0.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.90	4.39	-1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.57	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	6.09	-3.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.84	24.39	-13.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVES vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVES Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVES and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVES	AVLV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	3.18	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.86	-0.25

Drawdowns

AVES vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVES drawdown since its inception was -27.40%, which is greater than AVLV's maximum drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVES and AVLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVES	AVLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.40%	-19.50%	-7.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-6.39%	-6.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.50%	-19.50%	+1.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	0.00%	-1.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-3.93%	-3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	1.59%	+1.88%

Volatility

AVES vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a higher volatility of 6.93% compared to Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) at 3.12%. This indicates that AVES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVES	AVLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.93%	3.12%	+3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.44%	9.04%	+5.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.19%	12.29%	+4.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.98%	17.35%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	17.35%	-0.37%

AVES vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVES has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVES vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

AVES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than AVLV's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF	2.81%	3.17%	4.09%	3.96%	3.70%	0.62%
AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF	1.07%	1.33%	1.58%	1.85%	2.00%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVES and AVLV in my portfolio?

AVES and AVLV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVES or AVLV?

AVES has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to AVLV (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVES dropped -27.40% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

Which ETF is better, AVES or AVLV?

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 23.23% vs 20.73% for AVES. On fees, AVLV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, AVLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVES or AVLV?

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 23.23% return vs 20.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVES or AVLV?

AVLV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVES or AVLV?

AVES has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.07% for AVLV.

What is the main difference between AVES and AVLV?

AVES is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVLV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVES and 0.15% for AVLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.