AVEM vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AVEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. AVEM is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVEM returned 24.04%/yr vs 26.27%/yr for QGRW. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVEM charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

AVEM vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVEM achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly higher than QGRW's 10.35% return.

AVEM

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 25.08%
• 6M: 27.86%
• 1Y: 47.18%
• 3Y*: 24.04%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 11.58%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: 26.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVEM vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	25.08%	34.48%	7.49%	15.30%	-1.71%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	10.35%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AVEM and QGRW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022	0.62

The correlation between AVEM and QGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AVEM vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVEM	QGRW
Technology	32.3%	52.1%
Financial Services	20.7%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	12.4%
Industrials	9.2%	8.0%
Basic Materials	8.1%	-
Communication Services	5.4%	17.8%
Energy	5.1%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	0.5%
Healthcare	2.8%	4.3%
Utilities	2.6%	0.4%
Real Estate	1.6%	-

Return for Risk

AVEM vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVEM

AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 77
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 47
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVEM vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVEM	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.52	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.06	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.27	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	1.80	+1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.15	6.86	+6.29

AVEM vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVEM and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVEM vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVEM drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVEM	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.05%	-24.40%	-11.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.13%	-15.44%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	-24.40%	+6.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-5.67%	+2.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.07%	-3.27%	-6.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	4.04%	-0.59%

Volatility

AVEM vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a higher volatility of 10.91% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) at 7.09%. This indicates that AVEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVEM	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.91%	7.09%	+3.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.79%	14.83%	+3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.17%	18.25%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	21.20%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	21.20%	-0.44%

AVEM vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVEM has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVEM vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than QGRW's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.59%	2.45%	3.17%	3.06%	2.77%	2.61%	1.60%	0.35%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVEM and QGRW in my portfolio?

AVEM and QGRW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVEM or QGRW?

AVEM has higher volatility (10.91%) compared to QGRW (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEM dropped -36.05% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, AVEM or QGRW?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 26.27% vs 24.04% for AVEM. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QGRW has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVEM or QGRW?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 26.27% return vs 24.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVEM or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVEM or QGRW?

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between AVEM and QGRW?

AVEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVEM and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.