AVEM vs. QGRO
AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVEM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVEM returned 9.92%/yr vs 12.22%/yr for QGRO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVEM charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QGRO.
Performance
AVEM vs. QGRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVEM achieves a 27.59% return, which is significantly higher than QGRO's 2.19% return.
AVEM
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 55.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AVEM vs. QGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.59% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | 5.16% | 14.39% | 11.13% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 7.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVEM and QGRO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between AVEM and QGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVEM vs. QGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVEM
QGRO
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
AVEM
QGRO
Financial Services
AVEM
QGRO
Consumer Cyclical
AVEM
QGRO
Industrials
AVEM
QGRO
Basic Materials
AVEM
QGRO
Communication Services
AVEM
QGRO
Energy
AVEM
QGRO
Consumer Defensive
AVEM
QGRO
Healthcare
AVEM
QGRO
Utilities
AVEM
QGRO
Real Estate
AVEM
QGRO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVEM vs. QGRO — Risk / Return Rank
AVEM
QGRO
AVEM vs. QGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVEM | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.13 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 0.80 | +3.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.70 | 2.69 | +14.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVEM | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 0.71 | +2.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.67 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
AVEM vs. QGRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVEM drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than QGRO's maximum drawdown of -32.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM and QGRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVEM | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -32.56% | -3.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -13.54% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -23.82% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.00% | -31.86% | -2.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -0.67% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.09% | -7.68% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 4.03% | -0.73% |
Volatility
AVEM vs. QGRO - Volatility Comparison
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) at 3.38%. This indicates that AVEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVEM | QGRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.33% | 3.38% | +4.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.72% | 11.71% | +5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.45% | 15.33% | +4.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 21.06% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.55% | 22.93% | -2.38% |
AVEM vs. QGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVEM has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRO's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVEM vs. QGRO - Dividend Comparison
AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than QGRO's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVEM and QGRO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to QGRO (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEM dropped -36.05% vs QGRO's -32.56%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 12.22% vs 9.92% for AVEM. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QGRO has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 12.22% return vs 9.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVEM.
AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
AVEM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. AVEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index, while QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR). Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVEM and 0.29% for QGRO.
AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVEM and QGRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer