AVDV vs. SCHC
AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) and SCHC (Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. AVDV is actively managed, while SCHC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVDV returned 13.72%/yr vs 6.18%/yr for SCHC. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVDV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for SCHC.
Performance
AVDV vs. SCHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHC's 9.49% return.
AVDV
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 44.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHC
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 6M
- 12.08%
- 1Y
- 27.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 8.02%
AVDV vs. SCHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.04% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 9.49% | 37.59% | 1.97% | 14.36% | -21.74% | 12.02% | 10.48% | 11.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVDV and SCHC is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between AVDV and SCHC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
AVDV vs. SCHC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVDV
SCHC
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
AVDV
SCHC
Industrials
AVDV
SCHC
Consumer Cyclical
AVDV
SCHC
Financial Services
AVDV
SCHC
Energy
AVDV
SCHC
Technology
AVDV
SCHC
Consumer Defensive
AVDV
SCHC
Healthcare
AVDV
SCHC
Communication Services
AVDV
SCHC
Utilities
AVDV
SCHC
Real Estate
AVDV
SCHC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVDV vs. SCHC — Risk / Return Rank
AVDV
SCHC
AVDV vs. SCHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVDV | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.32 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.21 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.67 | 8.41 | +5.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVDV | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.86 | 1.78 | +1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.35 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.40 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
AVDV vs. SCHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHC drawdown of -43.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and SCHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVDV | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.01% | -43.94% | +0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.19% | -12.48% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.17% | -15.52% | +1.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.08% | -36.48% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -3.28% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -10.05% | +3.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 3.27% | -0.03% |
Volatility
AVDV vs. SCHC - Volatility Comparison
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF (SCHC) have volatilities of 4.92% and 5.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVDV | SCHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.92% | 5.05% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 13.05% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 15.50% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 17.50% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 17.99% | +1.74% |
AVDV vs. SCHC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHC's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVDV vs. SCHC - Dividend Comparison
AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than SCHC's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.74% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHC Schwab International Small-Cap Equity ETF | 3.34% | 3.66% | 3.72% | 2.94% | 1.78% | 3.02% | 1.62% | 3.23% | 2.51% | 2.73% | 2.01% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, AVDV and SCHC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHC has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs SCHC's -43.94%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 6.18% for SCHC. On fees, SCHC is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHC is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.
SCHC has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 2.74% for AVDV.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 0.11% for SCHC.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVDV and SCHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer