PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDS vs. FDTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDS vs. FDTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDS achieves a 12.02% return, which is significantly lower than FDTS's 16.64% return.


AVDS

1D
-1.09%
1M
2.73%
YTD
12.02%
6M
15.40%
1Y
32.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDTS

1D
-1.14%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
16.64%
6M
19.06%
1Y
45.71%
3Y*
25.36%
5Y*
10.59%
10Y*
10.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDS vs. FDTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVDS
Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF
12.02%38.18%3.20%3.79%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
16.64%51.17%2.44%2.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDS and FDTS is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2023

0.89

The correlation between AVDS and FDTS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVDS vs. FDTS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVDS
FDTS

Industrials

22.6%
23.0%

Basic Materials

17.0%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.8%
18.4%

Financial Services

12.1%
11.7%

Technology

9.7%
13.4%

Energy

6.1%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
5.0%

Healthcare

4.5%
3.0%

Real Estate

3.2%
4.3%

Utilities

3.2%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.9%
3.0%

Industrials

AVDS
22.6%
FDTS
23.0%

Basic Materials

AVDS
17.0%
FDTS
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

AVDS
12.8%
FDTS
18.4%

Financial Services

AVDS
12.1%
FDTS
11.7%

Technology

AVDS
9.7%
FDTS
13.4%

Energy

AVDS
6.1%
FDTS
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

AVDS
5.1%
FDTS
5.0%

Healthcare

AVDS
4.5%
FDTS
3.0%

Real Estate

AVDS
3.2%
FDTS
4.3%

Utilities

AVDS
3.2%
FDTS
2.7%

Communication Services

AVDS
2.9%
FDTS
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDS vs. FDTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDS
AVDS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
AVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FDTS
FDTS Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FDTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDTS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDTS Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDS vs. FDTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVDSFDTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

3.64

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.24

13.32

-3.08

AVDS vs. FDTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDS Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FDTS Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDS and FDTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVDSFDTSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

2.69

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

0.37

+0.89

Drawdowns

AVDS vs. FDTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDS drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, smaller than the maximum FDTS drawdown of -51.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDS and FDTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDSFDTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-51.26%

+37.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.44%

-12.61%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.73%

-6.49%

+4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-10.65%

+7.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.44%

-0.25%

Volatility

AVDS vs. FDTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF (AVDS) is 4.46%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund (FDTS) has a volatility of 6.54%. This indicates that AVDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDSFDTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.46%

6.54%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

14.09%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

17.05%

-2.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

29.28%

-13.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

24.85%

-9.49%

AVDS vs. FDTS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FDTS's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDS vs. FDTS - Dividend Comparison

AVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than FDTS's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVDS
Avantis International Small Cap Equity ETF
2.16%2.37%3.07%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FDTS
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US Small Cap AlphaDEX Fund
2.58%2.94%3.94%2.90%3.71%3.01%2.02%2.30%1.96%2.08%1.78%1.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVDS and FDTS have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDTS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to AVDS (4.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDS dropped -13.51% vs FDTS's -51.26%.

On 1-year performance, FDTS leads with 45.71% vs 32.62% for AVDS. On fees, AVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, AVDS has been the lower-risk option at 4.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FDTS has performed better with a 45.71% return vs 32.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.16% for AVDS.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for AVDS and 0.80% for FDTS.

FDTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDS and FDTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer