AVDE vs. RWK
AVDE (Avantis International Equity ETF) and RWK (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVDE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while RWK is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Revenue-Weighted Index. AVDE is actively managed, while RWK is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AVDE returned 9.61%/yr vs 10.58%/yr for RWK. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AVDE charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RWK.
Performance
AVDE vs. RWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVDE achieves a 8.71% return, which is significantly lower than RWK's 12.60% return.
AVDE
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.61%
- 10Y*
- —
RWK
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 12.51%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.66%
AVDE vs. RWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 8.71% | 38.05% | 4.88% | 17.18% | -13.68% | 13.62% | 8.26% | 8.07% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 12.60% | 10.27% | 11.94% | 23.76% | -8.19% | 34.31% | 11.06% | 10.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVDE and RWK is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between AVDE and RWK shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AVDE vs. RWK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AVDE
RWK
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
AVDE
RWK
Industrials
AVDE
RWK
Basic Materials
AVDE
RWK
Consumer Cyclical
AVDE
RWK
Energy
AVDE
RWK
Technology
AVDE
RWK
Healthcare
AVDE
RWK
Consumer Defensive
AVDE
RWK
Utilities
AVDE
RWK
Communication Services
AVDE
RWK
Real Estate
AVDE
RWK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVDE vs. RWK — Risk / Return Rank
AVDE
RWK
AVDE vs. RWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) and Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVDE | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.39 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | 7.67 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVDE | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | 1.60 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.50 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.48 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
AVDE vs. RWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVDE drawdown since its inception was -36.99%, smaller than the maximum RWK drawdown of -56.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDE and RWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVDE | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.99% | -56.49% | +19.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -11.14% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.46% | -24.58% | +11.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.73% | -24.58% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.02% | -0.99% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -7.55% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 3.46% | -0.54% |
Volatility
AVDE vs. RWK - Volatility Comparison
Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF (RWK) at 4.08%. This indicates that AVDE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVDE | RWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.67% | 4.08% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.43% | 11.88% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.75% | 16.67% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.33% | 21.13% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.92% | 22.95% | -4.03% |
AVDE vs. RWK - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVDE has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than RWK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVDE vs. RWK - Dividend Comparison
AVDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, more than RWK's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 2.56% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.01% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 1.63% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RWK Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Revenue ETF | 1.13% | 1.25% | 1.11% | 1.05% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 0.96% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 0.99% | 1.30% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVDE and RWK have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVDE has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to RWK (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDE dropped -36.99% vs RWK's -56.49%.
On 5-year performance, RWK leads with 10.58% vs 9.61% for AVDE. On fees, AVDE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, RWK has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RWK has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RWK.
AVDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.13% for RWK.
AVDE is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RWK is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for AVDE and 0.39% for RWK.
AVDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVDE and RWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer