PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVAV vs. GFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVAV vs. GFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVAV achieves a -38.19% return, which is significantly lower than GFI's -22.92% return. Over the past 10 years, AVAV has underperformed GFI with an annualized return of 18.26%, while GFI has yielded a comparatively higher 22.00% annualized return.


AVAV

1D
-5.81%
1M
5.16%
6M
-51.42%
YTD
-38.19%
1Y
-44.87%
3Y*
15.80%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
18.26%
ALL TIME*
9.61%

GFI

1D
1.30%
1M
2.57%
6M
-36.77%
YTD
-22.92%
1Y
37.97%
3Y*
32.51%
5Y*
33.70%
10Y*
22.00%
ALL TIME*
6.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$215.11M$378.25M$273.12M
$111.77M$121.08M$132.10M

AVAV vs. GFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
-38.19%57.18%22.10%47.14%38.09%-28.62%40.75%-9.14%20.99%109.32%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
-22.92%240.42%-6.27%44.90%-2.61%23.33%43.02%89.47%-16.75%45.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AVAV and GFI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007

0.10

The correlation between AVAV and GFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (10 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVAV:

$7.57B

GFI:

$29.27B

EPS

AVAV:

-$5.41

GFI:

$5.39

PS Ratio

AVAV:

5.17

GFI:

2.09

PB Ratio

AVAV:

1.72

GFI:

3.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVAV:

$1.42B

GFI:

$13.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVAV:

$246.70M

GFI:

$7.34B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVAV:

-$6.04M

GFI:

$8.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVAV vs. GFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVAV
AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GFI
GFI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVAV vs. GFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Gold Fields Limited (GFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVAVGFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.15

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

0.80

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.12

1.75

-2.87

AVAV vs. GFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVAV Sharpe Ratio is -0.61, which is lower than the GFI Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVAV and GFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVAV vs. GFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVAV drawdown since its inception was -66.65%, smaller than the maximum GFI drawdown of -88.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVAV and GFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVAVGFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.65%

-88.05%

+21.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.65%

-47.72%

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.65%

-47.72%

-18.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.65%

-56.22%

-10.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.65%

-63.09%

-3.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.52%

-45.29%

-18.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.90%

-44.24%

+15.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.00%

21.79%

+18.21%

Volatility

AVAV vs. GFI - Volatility Comparison

AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a higher volatility of 28.31% compared to Gold Fields Limited (GFI) at 11.80%. This indicates that AVAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVAVGFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.31%

11.80%

+16.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.32%

47.26%

+11.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.66%

61.54%

+12.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.50%

52.84%

+4.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.88%

54.64%

-1.76%

Dividends

AVAV vs. GFI - Dividend Comparison

AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFI
Gold Fields Limited
5.63%1.77%2.94%2.87%3.40%3.24%1.72%0.81%1.61%1.41%1.35%0.60%

Financials

AVAV vs. GFI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AeroVironment, Inc. and Gold Fields Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
80.12M
5.29B
(AVAV) Total Revenue
(GFI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVAV vs. GFI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AeroVironment, Inc. and Gold Fields Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
56.7%
Portfolio components
AVAV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

AVAV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.94M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

AVAV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a net income of -24.10M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVAV and GFI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVAV has higher volatility (28.31%) compared to GFI (11.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVAV dropped -66.65% vs GFI's -88.05%.

GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs -0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVAV and GFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer