PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSM vs. RMNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUSM vs. RMNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSM achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than RMNY's 2.39% return.


AUSM

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RMNY

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.78%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.78%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSM vs. RMNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AUSM and RMNY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUSM vs. RMNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSM

RMNY
RMNY Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RMNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMNY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
RMNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMNY Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSM vs. RMNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF (AUSM) and Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF (RMNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AUSM vs. RMNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUSMRMNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.98

0.60

+3.37

Drawdowns

AUSM vs. RMNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSM drawdown since its inception was -0.42%, smaller than the maximum RMNY drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSM and RMNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSMRMNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-5.70%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.19%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-1.53%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

Volatility

AUSM vs. RMNY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUSMRMNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73%

3.95%

-3.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.73%

5.19%

-4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.73%

5.19%

-4.46%

AUSM vs. RMNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSM has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than RMNY's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUSM vs. RMNY - Dividend Comparison

AUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than RMNY's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
AUSM
Allspring Ultra Short Municipal ETF
2.39%1.26%0.00%
RMNY
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF
4.31%4.10%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUSM and RMNY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AUSM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AUSM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMNY.

RMNY has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 2.39% for AUSM.

They also come from different issuers: Allspring and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for AUSM and 0.55% for RMNY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUSM and RMNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer