AUSF vs. FXAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX).
AUSF is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index (USD). It was launched on Aug 24, 2018. FXAIX is managed by Fidelity.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AUSF or FXAIX.
Performance
AUSF vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 19.26% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 25.56% return.
AUSF
19.26%
-0.41%
9.28%
29.32%
14.16%
N/A
FXAIX
25.56%
1.00%
11.92%
31.93%
15.65%
13.05%
Key characteristics
| AUSF | FXAIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.51 | 2.69 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.66 | 3.58 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.45 | 1.50 |
| Calmar Ratio | 5.63 | 3.90 |
| Martin Ratio | 15.54 | 17.55 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.94% | 1.88% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.02% | 12.25% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.24% | -33.79% |
| Current Drawdown | -2.26% | -1.35% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUSF vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and FXAIX is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AUSF vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AUSF vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than FXAIX's 1.23% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.23% | 1.83% | 1.99% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.03% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 1.95% | 2.07% | 1.81% | 2.01% | 2.56% | 2.63% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.24%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and FXAIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AUSF vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) at 4.06%. This indicates that AUSF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.