AUSF vs. AIRR
AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and AIRR (First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while AIRR is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AUSF returned 13.35%/yr vs 25.46%/yr for AIRR. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIRR.
Performance
AUSF vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly lower than AIRR's 31.74% return.
AUSF
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- —
AIRR
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 31.74%
- 6M
- 28.77%
- 1Y
- 67.12%
- 3Y*
- 35.29%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
AUSF vs. AIRR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 9.27% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -11.18% |
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 31.74% | 27.92% | 33.45% | 31.43% | -2.08% | 33.01% | 17.17% | 33.97% | -22.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and AIRR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AUSF and AIRR has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AUSF vs. AIRR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AUSF
AIRR
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
AUSF
AIRR
Technology
AUSF
AIRR
Industrials
AUSF
AIRR
Healthcare
AUSF
AIRR
-
Consumer Cyclical
AUSF
AIRR
-
Communication Services
AUSF
AIRR
-
Consumer Defensive
AUSF
AIRR
-
Real Estate
AUSF
AIRR
-
Utilities
AUSF
AIRR
-
Energy
AUSF
AIRR
Basic Materials
AUSF
AIRR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUSF vs. AIRR — Risk / Return Rank
AUSF
AIRR
AUSF vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUSF | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.40 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 5.01 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | 18.33 | -10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, roughly equal to the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and AIRR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUSF | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -42.37% | -1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -13.09% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -27.95% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -27.95% | +13.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.89% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -7.48% | +3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.02% | 3.57% | -1.55% |
Volatility
AUSF vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 2.70%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUSF | AIRR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 9.32% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.72% | 20.81% | -14.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 26.19% | -16.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.66% | 25.45% | -11.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 26.36% | -7.32% |
AUSF vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than AIRR's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUSF vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than AIRR's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIRR First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.18% | 0.23% | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.10% | 0.20% | 0.43% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.47% |
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.69% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUSF and AIRR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIRR has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to AUSF (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs AIRR's -42.37%.
On 5-year performance, AIRR leads with 25.46% vs 13.35% for AUSF. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIRR has performed better with a 25.46% return vs 13.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIRR.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.13% for AIRR.
AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while AIRR is Building & Construction. AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while AIRR tracks Richard Bernstein Advisors American Industrial Renaissance Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.69% for AIRR.
AIRR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUSF and AIRR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer