PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSF vs. AIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUSF vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.


AUSF

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.23%
YTD
6.72%
6M
7.67%
1Y
15.11%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*

AIQ

1D
-1.40%
1M
21.10%
YTD
35.98%
6M
36.15%
1Y
69.19%
3Y*
37.50%
5Y*
19.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSF vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
6.72%13.69%16.05%22.26%-0.18%27.48%1.27%24.06%-10.79%
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
35.98%31.89%24.11%55.39%-36.44%17.09%52.88%39.94%-18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and AIQ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between AUSF and AIQ has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AUSF vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AUSF
AIQ

Financial Services

18.7%
0.4%

Technology

13.5%
73.3%

Healthcare

12.0%
0.4%

Industrials

11.7%
4.2%

Communication Services

10.6%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
8.5%

Energy

5.2%

-

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Utilities

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

4.0%

-

Financial Services

AUSF
18.7%
AIQ
0.4%

Technology

AUSF
13.5%
AIQ
73.3%

Healthcare

AUSF
12.0%
AIQ
0.4%

Industrials

AUSF
11.7%
AIQ
4.2%

Communication Services

AUSF
10.6%
AIQ
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

AUSF
8.5%
AIQ

-

Consumer Cyclical

AUSF
7.8%
AIQ
8.5%

Energy

AUSF
5.2%
AIQ

-

Real Estate

AUSF
4.1%
AIQ

-

Utilities

AUSF
4.0%
AIQ

-

Basic Materials

AUSF
4.0%
AIQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUSF vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

AIQ
AIQ Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
AIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSF vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUSFAIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.49

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

4.22

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

14.59

-7.05

AUSF vs. AIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the AIQ Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and AIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUSFAIQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

3.02

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.76

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.84

-0.19

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, roughly equal to the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and AIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSFAIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-44.66%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.84%

-16.47%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-26.35%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-44.66%

+30.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-1.40%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-9.80%

+5.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

4.76%

-2.75%

Volatility

AUSF vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 2.41%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUSFAIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

8.60%

-6.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

18.46%

-11.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

23.04%

-12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.65%

25.33%

-11.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

25.50%

-6.43%

AUSF vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUSF vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AIQ
Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF
0.14%0.18%0.14%0.16%0.56%0.15%0.50%0.51%0.51%
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.76%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUSF and AIQ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs AIQ's -44.66%.

On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 19.07% vs 12.71% for AUSF. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.

AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.68% for AIQ.

AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUSF and AIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer