AUSF vs. AIQ
AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and AIQ (Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while AIQ is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AUSF returned 12.71%/yr vs 19.07%/yr for AIQ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for AIQ.
Performance
AUSF vs. AIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.72% return, which is significantly lower than AIQ's 35.98% return.
AUSF
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 7.67%
- 1Y
- 15.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- —
AIQ
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- 21.10%
- YTD
- 35.98%
- 6M
- 36.15%
- 1Y
- 69.19%
- 3Y*
- 37.50%
- 5Y*
- 19.07%
- 10Y*
- —
AUSF vs. AIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 6.72% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 35.98% | 31.89% | 24.11% | 55.39% | -36.44% | 17.09% | 52.88% | 39.94% | -18.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and AIQ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AUSF and AIQ has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AUSF vs. AIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AUSF
AIQ
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
AUSF
AIQ
Technology
AUSF
AIQ
Healthcare
AUSF
AIQ
Industrials
AUSF
AIQ
Communication Services
AUSF
AIQ
Consumer Defensive
AUSF
AIQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
AUSF
AIQ
Energy
AUSF
AIQ
-
Real Estate
AUSF
AIQ
-
Utilities
AUSF
AIQ
-
Basic Materials
AUSF
AIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUSF vs. AIQ — Risk / Return Rank
AUSF
AIQ
AUSF vs. AIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUSF | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.49 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 4.22 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.54 | 14.59 | -7.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUSF | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 3.02 | -1.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 | 0.76 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.84 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. AIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, roughly equal to the maximum AIQ drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and AIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUSF | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -44.66% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -16.47% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -26.35% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -44.66% | +30.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -1.40% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -9.80% | +5.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 4.76% | -2.75% |
Volatility
AUSF vs. AIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 2.41%, while Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF (AIQ) has a volatility of 8.60%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUSF | AIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 8.60% | -6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 18.46% | -11.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 23.04% | -12.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.65% | 25.33% | -11.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.07% | 25.50% | -6.43% |
AUSF vs. AIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than AIQ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUSF vs. AIQ - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than AIQ's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIQ Global X Artificial Intelligence & Technology ETF | 0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.16% | 0.56% | 0.15% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.76% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUSF and AIQ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIQ has higher volatility (8.60%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs AIQ's -44.66%.
On 5-year performance, AIQ leads with 19.07% vs 12.71% for AUSF. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AIQ has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for AIQ.
AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.14% for AIQ.
AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while AIQ is Technology Equities. AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while AIQ tracks Indxx Artificial Intelligence & Big Data Index. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.68% for AIQ.
AIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUSF and AIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer