AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AUM5.DE (Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR) and LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - AUM5.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while LHKG.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AUM5.DE returned 15.11%/yr vs 2.55%/yr for LHKG.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUM5.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LHKG.DE.

Performance

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUM5.DE achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than LHKG.DE's -6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AUM5.DE has outperformed LHKG.DE with an annualized return of 15.11%, while LHKG.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 2.55% annualized return.

AUM5.DE

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.38%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 25.63%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 14.88%
• 10Y*: 15.11%

LHKG.DE

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -2.25%
• YTD: -6.38%
• 6M: -8.89%
• 1Y: 2.88%
• 3Y*: 6.17%
• 5Y*: -2.20%
• 10Y*: 2.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AUM5.DE Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR	11.38%	4.80%	32.39%	22.64%	-14.14%	40.96%	7.10%	34.94%	-1.01%	6.82%
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist	-6.38%	21.50%	20.37%	-17.49%	-7.90%	-6.59%	-10.39%	16.35%	-8.73%	22.42%

Correlation

The correlation between AUM5.DE and LHKG.DE is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010	0.53

The correlation between AUM5.DE and LHKG.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUM5.DE

AUM5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 69
AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
AUM5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
AUM5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 70
AUM5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
AUM5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

LHKG.DE

LHKG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LHKG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
LHKG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 11
LHKG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
LHKG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) and Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUM5.DE	LHKG.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	0.18	+2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	0.40	+2.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.05	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	0.20	+3.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.74	0.38	+12.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUM5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUM5.DE and LHKG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUM5.DE	LHKG.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	0.18	+2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97	-0.09	+1.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93	0.11	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.96	0.12	+0.84

Drawdowns

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUM5.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.66%, smaller than the maximum LHKG.DE drawdown of -58.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUM5.DE and LHKG.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUM5.DE	LHKG.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-58.71%	+25.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.15%	-17.64%	+10.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.30%	-26.41%	+3.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.30%	-43.07%	+19.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.66%	-45.11%	+11.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.46%	-16.18%	+15.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.00%	-19.83%	+15.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	9.15%	-7.14%

Volatility

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR (AUM5.DE) is 2.63%, while Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that AUM5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LHKG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUM5.DE	LHKG.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	8.31%	-5.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.61%	14.08%	-6.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	19.89%	-8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.19%	24.93%	-9.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.07%	22.47%	-6.40%

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUM5.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LHKG.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUM5.DE vs. LHKG.DE - Dividend Comparison

AUM5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUM5.DE Amundi S&P 500 UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist	1.61%	1.50%	2.18%	0.17%	3.78%	1.35%	2.46%	2.58%	3.04%	2.30%	3.38%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUM5.DE and LHKG.DE in my portfolio?

AUM5.DE and LHKG.DE have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AUM5.DE or LHKG.DE?

On fees, AUM5.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUM5.DE or LHKG.DE?

AUM5.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.

What is the main difference between AUM5.DE and LHKG.DE?

AUM5.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while LHKG.DE is China Equities. AUM5.DE tracks S&P 500 Index, while LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AUM5.DE and 0.65% for LHKG.DE.