AULDX vs. SWLGX
AULDX (American Century Ultra Fund Class R6) and SWLGX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. AULDX is actively managed, while SWLGX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AULDX returned 12.69%/yr vs 15.39%/yr for SWLGX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AULDX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SWLGX.
Performance
AULDX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AULDX achieves a 8.07% return, which is significantly higher than SWLGX's 7.13% return.
AULDX
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 8.07%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 23.42%
- 3Y*
- 21.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.69%
- 10Y*
- 18.50%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- 7.13%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- 25.25%
- 3Y*
- 24.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.39%
- 10Y*
- —
AULDX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AULDX American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 | 8.07% | 13.05% | 29.99% | 43.86% | -32.15% | 23.89% | 50.31% | 35.23% | 1.04% | -0.95% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 7.13% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AULDX and SWLGX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2017 | 0.98 |
The correlation between AULDX and SWLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AULDX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
AULDX
SWLGX
AULDX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AULDX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.29 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.60 | -0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 5.38 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AULDX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.67 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.72 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.79 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
AULDX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AULDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AULDX and SWLGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AULDX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.03% | -32.69% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.60% | -16.16% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.78% | -23.30% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.03% | -32.69% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.99% | -1.73% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -7.05% | +0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 4.80% | -0.38% |
Volatility
AULDX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 3.67%. This indicates that AULDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AULDX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 3.67% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.44% | 11.67% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.38% | 15.46% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 21.50% | +1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.08% | 22.68% | -0.60% |
AULDX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AULDX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
AULDX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
AULDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.81%, more than SWLGX's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AULDX American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 | 9.81% | 10.60% | 3.32% | 5.68% | 6.97% | 6.42% | 2.67% | 4.18% | 7.94% | 6.19% | 4.45% | 5.06% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, AULDX and SWLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AULDX has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to SWLGX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AULDX dropped -35.03% vs SWLGX's -32.69%.
SWLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.67 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AULDX and SWLGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer