AULDX vs. CISIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AULDX (American Century Ultra Fund Class R6) and CISIX (Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund) are both mutual funds - AULDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by American Century, while CISIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Calvert Research and Management. Over the past 10 years, AULDX returned 18.33%/yr vs 15.95%/yr for CISIX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AULDX charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CISIX.

Performance

AULDX vs. CISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AULDX achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly lower than CISIX's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AULDX has outperformed CISIX with an annualized return of 18.33%, while CISIX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.95% annualized return.

AULDX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 5.47%
• 6M: 4.82%
• 1Y: 21.86%
• 3Y*: 19.64%
• 5Y*: 11.49%
• 10Y*: 18.33%

CISIX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 6M: 11.13%
• 1Y: 28.10%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: 12.49%
• 10Y*: 15.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AULDX vs. CISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AULDX American Century Ultra Fund Class R6	5.47%	13.05%	29.99%	43.86%	-32.15%	23.89%	50.31%	35.23%	1.04%	32.36%
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund	12.08%	15.90%	24.14%	27.27%	-21.68%	25.63%	26.12%	32.81%	-4.08%	21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AULDX and CISIX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.93

The correlation between AULDX and CISIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AULDX vs. CISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AULDX

AULDX Risk / Return Rank: 19
AULDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
AULDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AULDX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
AULDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
AULDX Martin Ratio Rank: 19

CISIX

CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 68
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AULDX vs. CISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AULDX	CISIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	2.24	-1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.06	-1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.40	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.36	3.02	-1.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.65	13.63	-8.97

AULDX vs. CISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AULDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the CISIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AULDX and CISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AULDX vs. CISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AULDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum CISIX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AULDX and CISIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AULDX	CISIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-59.36%	+24.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.60%	-9.72%	-5.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.78%	-19.94%	-4.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.03%	-27.37%	-7.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.03%	-32.82%	-2.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.34%	-0.90%	-3.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-14.26%	+8.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.55%	2.15%	+2.40%

Volatility

AULDX vs. CISIX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) has a higher volatility of 6.47% compared to Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) at 4.93%. This indicates that AULDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AULDX	CISIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.47%	4.93%	+1.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.59%	10.50%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.18%	13.16%	+4.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.69%	17.88%	+4.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.14%	18.62%	+3.52%

AULDX vs. CISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AULDX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than CISIX's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

AULDX vs. CISIX - Dividend Comparison

AULDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.05%, more than CISIX's 4.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AULDX American Century Ultra Fund Class R6	10.05%	10.60%	3.32%	5.68%	6.97%	6.42%	2.67%	4.18%	7.94%	6.19%	4.45%	5.06%
CISIX Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund	4.81%	5.39%	1.77%	1.02%	1.17%	1.02%	0.94%	1.14%	4.33%	2.41%	3.77%	7.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AULDX and CISIX in my portfolio?

AULDX and CISIX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AULDX or CISIX?

AULDX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to CISIX (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AULDX dropped -35.03% vs CISIX's -59.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.