PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUGZ vs. EBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGZ achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly lower than EBUF's 10.10% return.


AUGZ

1D
-0.55%
1M
4.32%
YTD
8.27%
6M
8.18%
1Y
20.84%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*

EBUF

1D
0.00%
1M
1.60%
YTD
10.10%
6M
11.54%
1Y
16.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AUGZ and EBUF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024

0.62

The correlation between AUGZ and EBUF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUGZ vs. EBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGZ
AUGZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AUGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

EBUF
EBUF Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
EBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) and Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUGZEBUFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.75

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

9.16

-6.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

37.53

-25.07

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the EBUF Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGZ and EBUF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUGZEBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

3.01

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.96

-0.87

Drawdowns

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGZ drawdown since its inception was -15.67%, which is greater than EBUF's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGZ and EBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUGZEBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.67%

-6.49%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.23%

-1.82%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.11%

-0.49%

-2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.44%

+1.24%

Volatility

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Volatility Comparison

TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF (AUGZ) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) at 1.72%. This indicates that AUGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUGZEBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

1.72%

+0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

4.71%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

5.55%

+3.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.97%

6.65%

+5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.10%

6.65%

+5.45%

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGZ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EBUF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUGZ vs. EBUF - Dividend Comparison

AUGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, while EBUF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AUGZ
TrueShares Structured Outcome (August) ETF
3.35%3.63%4.08%3.42%0.41%
EBUF
Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUGZ and EBUF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AUGZ has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to EBUF (1.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGZ dropped -15.67% vs EBUF's -6.49%.

On 1-year performance, AUGZ leads with 20.84% vs 16.62% for EBUF. On fees, AUGZ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, EBUF has been the lower-risk option at 1.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AUGZ has performed better with a 20.84% return vs 16.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUGZ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EBUF.

AUGZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 0.00% for EBUF.

They also come from different issuers: TrueShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for AUGZ and 0.89% for EBUF.

EBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUGZ and EBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer