AUGW vs. AIOO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

AUGW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUGW is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Allianz, while AIOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AUGW returned 10.52% vs 5.09% for AIOO. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUGW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.

Performance

AUGW vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGW achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.42% return.

AUGW

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 4.39%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 1Y: 10.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIOO

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 2.23%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 1Y: 5.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGW vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AUGW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF	4.98%	6.04%
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.42%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGW and AIOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.71

The correlation between AUGW and AIOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AUGW vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGW

AUGW Risk / Return Rank: 89
AUGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
AUGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AUGW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AUGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
AUGW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

AIOO

AIOO Risk / Return Rank: 93
AIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGW vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUGW	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.48	-0.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	3.84	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.48	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	6.90	-3.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.92	19.91	-1.99

AUGW vs. AIOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGW Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the AIOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGW and AIOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUGW vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGW and AIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGW	AIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-0.74%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.20%	-0.74%	-2.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.06%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.71%	-0.18%	-0.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	0.26%	+0.33%

Volatility

AUGW vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) have volatilities of 0.68% and 0.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUGW	AIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.68%	0.70%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.36%	1.42%	+1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.44%	2.06%	+2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.66%	2.05%	+4.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.66%	2.05%	+4.61%

AUGW vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUGW vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUGW nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUGW and AIOO in my portfolio?

AUGW and AIOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUGW or AIOO?

AIOO has higher volatility (0.70%) compared to AUGW (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGW dropped -8.76% vs AIOO's -0.74%.

Which ETF is better, AUGW or AIOO?

On 1-year performance, AUGW leads with 10.52% vs 5.09% for AIOO. On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUGW or AIOO?

Over the 1-year period, AUGW has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUGW or AIOO?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for AUGW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUGW or AIOO?

AUGW and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AUGW and AIOO?

AUGW is categorized as Options Trading, while AIOO is Defined Outcome. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for AUGW and 0.64% for AIOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.