PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUGU vs. QDTE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUGU vs. QDTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGU achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than QDTE's 16.58% return.


AUGU

1D
-0.65%
1M
4.64%
YTD
8.60%
6M
8.31%
1Y
21.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDTE

1D
-0.16%
1M
8.99%
YTD
16.58%
6M
16.20%
1Y
40.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGU vs. QDTE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AUGU and QDTE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024

0.90

The correlation between AUGU and QDTE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUGU vs. QDTE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGU
AUGU Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AUGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUGU Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AUGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

QDTE
QDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGU vs. QDTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) and Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUGUQDTEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.47

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

3.98

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

16.08

-2.79

AUGU vs. QDTE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGU Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the QDTE Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGU and QDTE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUGUQDTEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.74

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.36

1.30

+0.06

Drawdowns

AUGU vs. QDTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGU drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum QDTE drawdown of -22.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGU and QDTE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUGUQDTEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.17%

-22.86%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.72%

-10.20%

+3.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.16%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-3.14%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

2.52%

-0.89%

Volatility

AUGU vs. QDTE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) is 2.79%, while Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (QDTE) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that AUGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDTE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUGUQDTEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

3.75%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.02%

11.01%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.36%

14.81%

-5.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.06%

18.43%

-7.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.06%

18.43%

-7.37%

AUGU vs. QDTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than QDTE's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUGU vs. QDTE - Dividend Comparison

AUGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.16%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, AUGU and QDTE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QDTE has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to AUGU (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGU dropped -12.17% vs QDTE's -22.86%.

On 1-year performance, QDTE leads with 40.36% vs 21.60% for AUGU. On fees, AUGU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, AUGU has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QDTE has performed better with a 40.36% return vs 21.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AUGU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE has the higher dividend yield at 42.16%, compared with 0.00% for AUGU.

AUGU is categorized as Options Trading, while QDTE is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for AUGU and 0.97% for QDTE.

QDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUGU and QDTE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer