AUGP vs. PJFG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AUGP (PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August) and PJFG (PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUGP is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM, while PJFG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AUGP returned 17.28% vs 13.11% for PJFG. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AUGP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PJFG.

Performance

AUGP vs. PJFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August (AUGP) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGP achieves a 5.54% return, which is significantly higher than PJFG's 1.35% return.

AUGP

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 5.54%
• 6M: 5.30%
• 1Y: 17.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJFG

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: 0.28%
• 1Y: 13.11%
• 3Y*: 21.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGP vs. PJFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AUGP PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August	5.54%	14.70%	8.27%
PJFG PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF	1.35%	16.94%	16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGP and PJFG is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2024	0.84

The correlation between AUGP and PJFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AUGP vs. PJFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGP

AUGP Risk / Return Rank: 87
AUGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
AUGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
AUGP Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AUGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
AUGP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PJFG

PJFG Risk / Return Rank: 20
PJFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PJFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
PJFG Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PJFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PJFG Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGP vs. PJFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August (AUGP) and PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUGP	PJFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	0.74	+1.84
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	1.11	+2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.14	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.52	0.69	+2.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.96	2.13	+16.83

AUGP vs. PJFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGP Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the PJFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGP and PJFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUGP vs. PJFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGP drawdown since its inception was -12.03%, smaller than the maximum PJFG drawdown of -24.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGP and PJFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGP	PJFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-24.24%	+12.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.93%	-19.00%	+14.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	-7.01%	+6.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-3.79%	+2.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	6.16%	-5.25%

Volatility

AUGP vs. PJFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - August (AUGP) is 1.52%, while PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF (PJFG) has a volatility of 6.89%. This indicates that AUGP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PJFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUGP	PJFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	6.89%	-5.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.27%	13.96%	-8.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.77%	17.77%	-11.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.59%	20.98%	-11.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.59%	20.98%	-11.39%

AUGP vs. PJFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than PJFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUGP vs. PJFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither AUGP nor PJFG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUGP and PJFG in my portfolio?

AUGP and PJFG have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUGP or PJFG?

PJFG has higher volatility (6.89%) compared to AUGP (1.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGP dropped -12.03% vs PJFG's -24.24%.

Which ETF is better, AUGP or PJFG?

On 1-year performance, AUGP leads with 17.28% vs 13.11% for PJFG. On fees, AUGP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, AUGP has been the lower-risk option at 1.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUGP or PJFG?

Over the 1-year period, AUGP has performed better with a 17.28% return vs 13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUGP or PJFG?

AUGP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PJFG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUGP or PJFG?

AUGP and PJFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AUGP and PJFG?

AUGP is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PJFG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for AUGP and 0.75% for PJFG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.