PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUEIX vs. NUKZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
0.79%6.95%11.37%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
3.57%56.57%62.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUEIX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 3.57% return.


AUEIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
0.79%
6M
-1.36%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
6.73%
10Y*
10.46%

NUKZ

1D
3.64%
1M
-10.35%
YTD
3.57%
6M
2.03%
1Y
74.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUEIX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AUEIX vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUEIX
AUEIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
AUEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
AUEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUEIXNUKZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.33

2.35

-2.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.54

3.02

-2.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.38

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

4.34

-4.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.55

11.46

-9.91

AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUEIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUEIX and NUKZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUEIXNUKZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

2.35

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.73

-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between AUEIX and NUKZ is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

AUEIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.52%, more than NUKZ's 0.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUEIX
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund
22.52%22.70%24.31%24.28%10.26%2.54%1.29%1.12%1.67%2.36%1.99%6.18%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.88%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUEIX drawdown since its inception was -30.82%, smaller than the maximum NUKZ drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUEIX and NUKZ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AUEIXNUKZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.82%

-33.03%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-16.51%

+7.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

-11.55%

+6.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-6.09%

+2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

6.25%

-4.30%

Volatility

AUEIX vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Large Cap Defensive Style Fund (AUEIX) is 2.56%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that AUEIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AUEIXNUKZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

10.20%

-7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

21.54%

-15.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.05%

31.75%

-19.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

32.60%

-19.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

32.60%

-17.39%