AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L
AUCP.L (L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF) and AIGP.L (WisdomTree Precious Metals) are both Precious Metals funds - AUCP.L tracks the STOXX Global Gold Miners while AIGP.L tracks the Bloomberg Precious Metals. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AUCP.L returned 16.41%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for AIGP.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUCP.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for AIGP.L.
Performance
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AUCP.L is traded in GBp, while AIGP.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AIGP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUCP.L achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than AIGP.L's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AUCP.L has outperformed AIGP.L with an annualized return of 16.41%, while AIGP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 12.86% annualized return.
AUCP.L
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -6.20%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- 1Y
- 64.93%
- 3Y*
- 46.06%
- 5Y*
- 23.58%
- 10Y*
- 16.41%
AIGP.L
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 49.76%
- 3Y*
- 30.14%
- 5Y*
- 18.97%
- 10Y*
- 12.86%
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUCP.L L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF | -0.57% | 161.99% | 20.20% | 8.69% | -4.04% | -8.91% | 17.60% | 39.53% | -5.63% | 0.57% |
AIGP.L WisdomTree Precious Metals | 4.75% | 65.90% | 25.41% | 2.42% | 10.92% | -6.87% | 20.42% | 11.65% | 0.94% | -1.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUCP.L and AIGP.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2008 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, AUCP.L and AIGP.L have become more correlated (0.82) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L — Risk / Return Rank
AUCP.L
AIGP.L
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) and WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUCP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.31 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.36 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 6.07 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUCP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.67 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 1.08 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.76 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.56 | -0.30 |
Drawdowns
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUCP.L drawdown since its inception was -77.57%, which is greater than AIGP.L's maximum drawdown of -51.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCP.L and AIGP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUCP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.57% | -51.55% | -26.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.56% | -21.00% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.56% | -21.00% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.38% | -21.00% | -18.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.72% | -23.05% | -22.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.67% | -18.44% | -7.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.74% | -19.70% | -16.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.51% | 8.17% | +3.34% |
Volatility
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCP.L) has a higher volatility of 13.97% compared to WisdomTree Precious Metals (AIGP.L) at 7.75%. This indicates that AUCP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIGP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUCP.L | AIGP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.97% | 7.75% | +6.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.06% | 26.85% | +7.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.95% | 29.66% | +14.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 21.10% | +14.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.66% | 20.20% | +14.46% |
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUCP.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AIGP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUCP.L vs. AIGP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUCP.L nor AIGP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AUCP.L and AIGP.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIGP.L is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIGP.L is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AUCP.L.
AUCP.L tracks STOXX Global Gold Miners, while AIGP.L tracks Bloomberg Precious Metals. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AUCP.L and 0.49% for AIGP.L.
Find the right allocation for AUCP.L and AIGP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer