PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATZ.TO vs. IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATZ.TO is traded in CAD, while IBKR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBKR values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ATZ.TO having a 43.60% return and IBKR slightly higher at 44.37%.


ATZ.TO

1D
1.59%
1M
20.72%
YTD
43.60%
6M
48.06%
1Y
158.47%
3Y*
67.44%
5Y*
38.38%
10Y*

IBKR

1D
2.42%
1M
6.38%
YTD
44.37%
6M
43.88%
1Y
85.50%
3Y*
69.83%
5Y*
45.79%
10Y*
27.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATZ.TO
Aritzia Inc.
43.60%119.59%94.33%-41.92%-9.55%102.99%35.38%16.16%29.24%-27.49%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
44.37%39.69%132.59%12.40%-2.55%31.05%28.59%-17.56%0.68%52.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ATZ.TO and IBKR is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2016

0.22

The correlation between ATZ.TO and IBKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATZ.TO:

CA$20.25B

IBKR:

$40.72B

EPS

ATZ.TO:

CA$3.19

IBKR:

$3.76

PE Ratio

ATZ.TO:

52.81

IBKR:

24.18

PEG Ratio

ATZ.TO:

1.05

IBKR:

0.83

PS Ratio

ATZ.TO:

5.45

IBKR:

4.66

PB Ratio

ATZ.TO:

14.88

IBKR:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATZ.TO:

CA$3.70B

IBKR:

$8.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATZ.TO:

CA$1.65B

IBKR:

$7.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATZ.TO:

CA$736.90M

IBKR:

$7.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATZ.TO
ATZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

IBKR
IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATZ.TOIBKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.34

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.47

4.78

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.39

11.14

+7.25

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.05, which is higher than the IBKR Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATZ.TO and IBKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATZ.TO drawdown since its inception was -64.82%, which is greater than IBKR's maximum drawdown of -60.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATZ.TO and IBKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATZ.TOIBKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.82%

-60.80%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.22%

-17.26%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.84%

-38.74%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.82%

-38.74%

-26.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.12%

-24.70%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.15%

7.39%

+0.76%

Volatility

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) is 10.40%, while Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) has a volatility of 11.24%. This indicates that ATZ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATZ.TOIBKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.40%

11.24%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.77%

27.89%

+2.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.12%

37.68%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.69%

35.00%

+11.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.07%

33.89%

+9.18%

Dividends

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Dividend Comparison

ATZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBKR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATZ.TO
Aritzia Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBKR
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
0.36%0.47%0.48%0.48%0.55%0.50%0.66%0.86%0.73%0.68%1.10%0.92%

Financials

ATZ.TO vs. IBKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aritzia Inc. and Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.19B
765.00M
(ATZ.TO) Total Revenue
(IBKR) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ATZ.TO values in CAD, IBKR values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ATZ.TO and IBKR have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATZ.TO and IBKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer