PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATYM.L is traded in GBp, while NRJL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the NRJL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATYM.L achieves a -1.58% return, which is significantly lower than NRJL.L's 36.32% return.


ATYM.L

1D
-1.92%
1M
13.64%
YTD
-1.58%
6M
10.87%
1Y
88.41%
3Y*
39.67%
5Y*
23.20%
10Y*
23.88%

NRJL.L

1D
-2.12%
1M
2.01%
YTD
36.32%
6M
132.36%
1Y
205.26%
3Y*
29.93%
5Y*
31.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
-1.58%141.03%0.93%11.73%-17.55%88.92%34.67%
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
36.32%130.90%-11.57%-22.89%20.78%36.43%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between ATYM.L and NRJL.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.29

The correlation between ATYM.L and NRJL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATYM.L
ATYM.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NRJL.L
NRJL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRJL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) and Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATYM.LNRJL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

2.46

-1.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

23.97

-21.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.49

85.38

-78.88

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATYM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the NRJL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATYM.L and NRJL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATYM.LNRJL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.85

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.69

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.67

-0.54

Drawdowns

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATYM.L drawdown since its inception was -93.04%, which is greater than NRJL.L's maximum drawdown of -51.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATYM.L and NRJL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATYM.LNRJL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.04%

-51.06%

-41.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.50%

-8.51%

-27.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.87%

-40.91%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.48%

-51.06%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.65%

-2.51%

-19.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.84%

-22.13%

-39.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.57%

2.39%

+11.18%

Volatility

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L - Volatility Comparison

Atalaya Mining Ltd (ATYM.L) has a higher volatility of 15.28% compared to Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (NRJL.L) at 7.66%. This indicates that ATYM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NRJL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATYM.LNRJL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.28%

7.66%

+7.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.21%

54.66%

-18.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.52%

71.66%

-28.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.78%

45.42%

-5.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.30%

43.84%

-4.54%

Dividends

ATYM.L vs. NRJL.L - Dividend Comparison

ATYM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than NRJL.L's 30.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
ATYM.L
Atalaya Mining Ltd
0.72%0.71%1.72%1.91%2.12%7.14%
NRJL.L
Lyxor MSCI New Energy ESG Filtered (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
30.86%42.07%0.73%0.77%23.99%31.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATYM.L and NRJL.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATYM.L and NRJL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer