ATWYX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 27, 2026

ATWYX (AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both mutual funds - ATWYX is a Global Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FFANX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, ATWYX returned 12.55%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for FFANX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ATWYX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATWYX achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than FFANX's 6.95% return. Over the past 10 years, ATWYX has outperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 12.55%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.02% annualized return.

ATWYX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -0.80%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 6M: 9.21%
• 1Y: 22.82%
• 3Y*: 20.15%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: 12.55%

FFANX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 6.95%
• 6M: 6.51%
• 1Y: 14.43%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: 5.17%
• 10Y*: 7.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATWYX AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy	10.18%	21.44%	18.72%	20.55%	-18.58%	20.45%	12.70%	25.56%	-9.76%	23.04%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	6.95%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ATWYX and FFANX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007	0.93

The correlation between ATWYX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ATWYX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATWYX

ATWYX Risk / Return Rank: 58
ATWYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ATWYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ATWYX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ATWYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ATWYX Martin Ratio Rank: 68

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATWYX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.13	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	3.03	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.41	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	2.92	-0.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.80	12.40	-1.60

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATWYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATWYX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATWYX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATWYX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATWYX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.14%	-31.69%	-27.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.75%	-5.20%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.58%	-7.55%	-10.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.21%	-18.52%	-7.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.33%	-18.52%	-15.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.87%	-0.60%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.96%	-3.79%	-6.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	1.22%	+1.01%

Volatility

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 3.06%. This indicates that ATWYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATWYX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.04%	3.06%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.97%	6.08%	+4.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.39%	7.12%	+6.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.12%	7.95%	+8.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	7.72%	+9.01%

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATWYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATWYX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

ATWYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, more than FFANX's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATWYX AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy	4.00%	4.41%	2.49%	1.84%	5.88%	5.81%	1.23%	4.93%	5.57%	12.93%	3.16%	7.84%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.67%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATWYX and FFANX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, ATWYX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ATWYX or FFANX?

ATWYX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to FFANX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATWYX dropped -59.14% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.