ATWYX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
ATWYX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 1, 2003. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
ATWYX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ATWYX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATWYX AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy | -1.67% | 21.44% | 18.72% | 20.55% | -18.58% | 20.45% | 12.70% | 25.56% | -9.76% | 23.04% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATWYX achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ATWYX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 10.79%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.96% annualized return.
ATWYX
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 21.55%
- 3Y*
- 17.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ATWYX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATWYX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ATWYX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
ATWYX
FASGX
ATWYX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATWYX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.86 | 2.01 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.30 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 2.00 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.56 | 8.74 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATWYX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.27 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.55 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.71 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.60 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between ATWYX and FASGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ATWYX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
ATWYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATWYX AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy | 4.48% | 4.41% | 2.49% | 1.84% | 5.88% | 5.81% | 1.23% | 4.93% | 5.57% | 12.93% | 3.16% | 7.84% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
ATWYX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATWYX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATWYX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATWYX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -47.35% | -11.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.66% | -9.07% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.21% | -23.54% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.33% | -27.20% | -7.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.88% | -5.77% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.05% | -6.74% | -3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 2.07% | +0.53% |
Volatility
ATWYX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy (ATWYX) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 5.30%. This indicates that ATWYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ATWYX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 5.30% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 8.12% | +1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.46% | 13.00% | +4.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.96% | 12.18% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 12.58% | +4.13% |