PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATTR vs. NLSI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATTR vs. NLSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 4.25% return, which is significantly lower than NLSI's 7.01% return.


ATTR

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.85%
YTD
4.25%
6M
4.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NLSI

1D
-0.92%
1M
10.92%
YTD
7.01%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATTR vs. NLSI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ATTR
Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF
4.25%0.01%
NLSI
Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF
7.01%1.90%

Correlation

The correlation between ATTR and NLSI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATTR vs. NLSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ATTR vs. NLSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATTRNLSIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.81

1.04

+1.77

Drawdowns

ATTR vs. NLSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum NLSI drawdown of -13.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and NLSI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATTRNLSIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-13.82%

+12.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-1.33%

+1.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-6.10%

+5.92%

Volatility

ATTR vs. NLSI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATTRNLSIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.97%

19.37%

-16.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.97%

19.37%

-16.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.97%

19.37%

-16.40%

ATTR vs. NLSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than NLSI's 2.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATTR vs. NLSI - Dividend Comparison

ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%.


PositionTTM2025
ATTR
Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%
NLSI
Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF
2.42%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATTR and NLSI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.

NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.

They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 2.89% for NLSI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATTR and NLSI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer