ATTR vs. HELS
ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and HELS (Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HELS.
Performance
ATTR vs. HELS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly higher than HELS's -1.16% return.
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HELS
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -3.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATTR vs. HELS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 3.44% | 0.01% |
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | -1.16% | -2.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATTR and HELS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATTR vs. HELS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF (HELS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATTR vs. HELS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum HELS drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and HELS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATTR | HELS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -13.60% | +11.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -7.39% | +6.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -5.69% | +5.47% |
Volatility
ATTR vs. HELS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATTR | HELS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 16.59% | -13.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 16.59% | -13.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 16.59% | -13.42% |
ATTR vs. HELS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than HELS's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATTR vs. HELS - Dividend Comparison
ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HELS Hedgeye 130/30 Equity ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATTR and HELS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HELS.
HELS has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 0.70% for HELS.
Find the right allocation for ATTR and HELS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer