ATTR vs. HEFT
ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) and HEFT (Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATTR charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for HEFT.
Performance
ATTR vs. HEFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATTR achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than HEFT's 4.04% return.
ATTR
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEFT
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATTR vs. HEFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 3.44% | 0.45% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 4.04% | 1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATTR and HEFT is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATTR vs. HEFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR) and Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF (HEFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATTR vs. HEFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATTR drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum HEFT drawdown of -9.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATTR and HEFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATTR | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -9.17% | +7.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -6.13% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -3.32% | +3.10% |
Volatility
ATTR vs. HEFT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATTR | HEFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 13.50% | -10.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 13.50% | -10.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.17% | 13.50% | -10.33% |
ATTR vs. HEFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATTR has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than HEFT's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATTR vs. HEFT - Dividend Comparison
ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HEFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEFT Hedgeye Fourth Turning ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATTR and HEFT have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HEFT.
HEFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Arin Risk Advisors and Hedgeye. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for ATTR and 0.70% for HEFT.
Find the right allocation for ATTR and HEFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer