PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATO vs. MO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATO vs. MO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATO achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 26.86% return. Over the past 10 years, ATO has outperformed MO with an annualized return of 10.94%, while MO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.


ATO

1D
1.03%
1M
-5.02%
YTD
2.53%
6M
2.08%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
13.58%
10Y*
10.94%

MO

1D
0.74%
1M
0.56%
YTD
26.86%
6M
26.78%
1Y
28.51%
3Y*
25.73%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
7.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATO vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.53%23.07%23.35%6.17%9.63%12.75%-12.73%23.14%10.39%18.41%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
26.86%18.17%40.76%-3.70%4.37%24.18%-10.21%7.87%-27.14%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ATO and MO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1987

0.24

The correlation between ATO and MO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATO:

$28.52B

MO:

$120.36B

EPS

ATO:

$8.23

MO:

$4.79

PE Ratio

ATO:

20.66

MO:

15.00

PEG Ratio

ATO:

2.03

MO:

0.32

PS Ratio

ATO:

5.70

MO:

5.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATO:

$4.88B

MO:

$21.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATO:

$1.61B

MO:

$14.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATO:

$2.57B

MO:

$11.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATO vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATO
ATO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ATO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ATO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MO
MO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
MO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
MO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
MO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATO vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.75

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

4.39

-1.40

ATO vs. MO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATO Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the MO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATO and MO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATO vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATO drawdown since its inception was -51.94%, smaller than the maximum MO drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATO and MO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.94%

-65.43%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.58%

-16.40%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.87%

-16.40%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.08%

-25.83%

+6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.91%

-53.69%

+20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.11%

-3.50%

-7.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.56%

-11.92%

+3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

6.50%

-2.32%

Volatility

ATO vs. MO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) is 5.26%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that ATO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

6.71%

-1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.25%

17.60%

-6.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.54%

22.59%

-7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

20.68%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.24%

22.97%

-1.73%

Dividends

ATO vs. MO - Dividend Comparison

ATO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than MO's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
2.28%2.15%2.36%2.61%2.48%2.44%2.46%1.92%2.14%2.14%2.31%2.52%
MO
Altria Group, Inc.
5.84%7.21%7.65%9.52%8.05%7.43%8.29%6.57%6.07%3.56%3.48%3.73%

Financials

ATO vs. MO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmos Energy Corporation and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
1.96B
5.43B
(ATO) Total Revenue
(MO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ATO vs. MO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atmos Energy Corporation and Altria Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
64.6%
Portfolio components
ATO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.

ATO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 764.80M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

MO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.

ATO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atmos Energy Corporation reported a net income of 581.90M and revenue of 1.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.

MO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATO and MO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MO has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to ATO (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATO dropped -51.94% vs MO's -65.43%.

MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATO and MO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer