PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATMU vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATMU vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATMU achieves a -8.57% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.


ATMU

1D
0.25%
1M
-6.43%
YTD
-8.57%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
32.45%
5Y*
10Y*

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATMU vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
-8.57%33.16%67.28%8.50%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%23.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ATMU and SPMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2023

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATMU vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMU
ATMU Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ATMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATMU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ATMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATMU Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMU vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATMUSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.47

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

3.64

-2.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.65

14.17

-10.51

ATMU vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMU Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMU and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATMUSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.62

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

1.01

-0.13

Drawdowns

ATMU vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMU drawdown since its inception was -30.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMU and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATMUSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.22%

-30.95%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.22%

-12.70%

-17.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.22%

-20.13%

-10.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.68%

0.00%

-27.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.51%

-4.60%

-3.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.23%

3.26%

+4.97%

Volatility

ATMU vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) has a higher volatility of 11.78% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 7.35%. This indicates that ATMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATMUSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.78%

7.35%

+4.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.46%

14.39%

+16.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.82%

17.64%

+18.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.42%

19.30%

+15.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.42%

20.31%

+14.11%

Dividends

ATMU vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

ATMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATMU
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.
0.46%0.40%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATMU and SPMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATMU has higher volatility (11.78%) compared to SPMO (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMU dropped -30.22% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATMU and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer