ATMU vs. SLGL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL).

Performance

ATMU vs. SLGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATMU vs. SLGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.	9.45%	33.16%	67.28%	8.50%
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.	87.99%	353.07%	-15.83%	-69.31%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATMU : $4.68B SLGL : $220.70M
EPS ATMU : $2.51 SLGL : -$2.20
PS Ratio ATMU : 3.56 SLGL : 11.38
PB Ratio ATMU : 12.36 SLGL : 9.68
Total Revenue (TTM) ATMU : $1.32B SLGL : $19.39M
Gross Profit (TTM) ATMU : $509.50M SLGL : $19.28M
EBITDA (TTM) ATMU : $323.10M SLGL : $10.89M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATMU achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than SLGL's 87.99% return.

ATMU

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -12.03%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 6M: 26.15%
• 1Y: 55.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SLGL

• 1D: 15.58%
• 1M: -13.59%
• YTD: 87.99%
• 6M: 171.77%
• 1Y: 1,423.46%
• 3Y*: 26.86%
• 5Y*: -8.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATMU vs. SLGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMU

ATMU Risk / Return Rank: 86
ATMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ATMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ATMU Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ATMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ATMU Martin Ratio Rank: 87

SLGL

SLGL Risk / Return Rank: 99
SLGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SLGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
SLGL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
SLGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SLGL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMU vs. SLGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATMU	SLGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	10.94	-9.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	5.44	-3.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.81	-0.50
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	27.89	-24.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	113.10	-104.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATMU vs. SLGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the SLGL Sharpe Ratio of 10.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMU and SLGL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATMU	SLGL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	10.94	-9.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	-0.05	+1.31

Correlation

The correlation between ATMU and SLGL is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ATMU vs. SLGL - Dividend Comparison

ATMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, while SLGL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.	0.38%	0.40%	0.26%
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ATMU vs. SLGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMU drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum SLGL drawdown of -97.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMU and SLGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATMU	SLGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-97.87%	+69.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-48.06%	+31.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-97.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.42%	-53.81%	+40.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-62.89%	+54.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.70%	11.85%	-6.15%

Volatility

ATMU vs. SLGL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) is 11.98%, while Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) has a volatility of 42.00%. This indicates that ATMU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATMU	SLGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.98%	42.00%	-30.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.33%	70.58%	-49.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.37%	131.87%	-98.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.51%	160.42%	-127.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.51%	133.63%	-101.12%

Financials