ATMU vs. PH
ATMU (Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — ATMU in Pollution & Treatment Controls, PH in Specialty Industrial Machinery. Over the past 3 years, ATMU returned 32.01%/yr vs 38.27%/yr for PH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
ATMU vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATMU achieves a -3.20% return, which is significantly lower than PH's 8.25% return.
ATMU
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -6.44%
- 1Y
- 42.20%
- 3Y*
- 32.01%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PH
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 38.27%
- 5Y*
- 27.59%
- 10Y*
- 26.41%
ATMU vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. | -3.20% | 33.16% | 67.28% | 8.40% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 8.25% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 41.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATMU and PH is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2023 | 0.52 |
The correlation between ATMU and PH shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ATMU:
$4.11B
PH:
$121.29B
ATMU:
$2.56
PH:
$27.11
ATMU:
19.61
PH:
34.95
ATMU:
3.53
PH:
1.47
ATMU:
3.07
PH:
5.80
ATMU:
10.19
PH:
7.79
ATMU:
$1.35B
PH:
$20.99B
ATMU:
$529.00M
PH:
$7.81B
ATMU:
$334.60M
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATMU vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
ATMU
PH
ATMU vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATMU | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.31 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.28 | -0.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | 6.65 | -2.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATMU vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATMU drawdown since its inception was -30.22%, smaller than the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMU and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATMU | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.22% | -66.92% | +36.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.22% | -19.34% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.22% | -26.79% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -54.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.43% | -7.16% | -16.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.77% | -15.32% | +6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.99% | 6.62% | +3.37% |
Volatility
ATMU vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 7.72%. This indicates that ATMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATMU | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 7.72% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.16% | 19.08% | +12.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.49% | 25.14% | +11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.48% | 28.64% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.48% | 31.65% | +2.83% |
Dividends
ATMU vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
ATMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than PH's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.78% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
ATMU vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ATMU and PH have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATMU has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to PH (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATMU dropped -30.22% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATMU and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer