ATMU vs. PH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH).

Performance

ATMU vs. PH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ATMU vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.	9.45%	33.16%	67.28%	8.50%
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation	2.04%	39.54%	39.58%	39.41%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATMU : $4.68B PH : $114.68B
EPS ATMU : $2.51 PH : $27.53
PE Ratio ATMU : 22.64 PH : 32.52
PEG Ratio ATMU : 4.07 PH : 1.37
PS Ratio ATMU : 3.56 PH : 5.62
PB Ratio ATMU : 12.36 PH : 7.48
Total Revenue (TTM) ATMU : $1.32B PH : $20.46B
Gross Profit (TTM) ATMU : $509.50M PH : $7.63B
EBITDA (TTM) ATMU : $323.10M PH : $5.26B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATMU achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 2.04% return.

ATMU

• 1D: 3.56%
• 1M: -12.03%
• YTD: 9.45%
• 6M: 26.15%
• 1Y: 55.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PH

• 1D: 3.92%
• 1M: -11.29%
• YTD: 2.04%
• 6M: 18.56%
• 1Y: 48.64%
• 3Y*: 40.22%
• 5Y*: 24.76%
• 10Y*: 25.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ATMU vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATMU

ATMU Risk / Return Rank: 86
ATMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ATMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ATMU Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ATMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ATMU Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PH

PH Risk / Return Rank: 86
PH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
PH Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
PH Omega Ratio Rank: 86
PH Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATMU vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATMU	PH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	1.59	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.19	+0.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.33	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	2.83	+0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	10.89	-1.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATMU vs. PH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATMU Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the PH Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATMU and PH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATMU	PH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.67	1.59	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.45	+0.82

Correlation

The correlation between ATMU and PH is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ATMU vs. PH - Dividend Comparison

ATMU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than PH's 0.80% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATMU Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc.	0.38%	0.40%	0.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation	0.80%	0.80%	1.00%	1.25%	1.73%	1.25%	1.29%	1.65%	1.97%	1.32%	1.80%	2.60%

Drawdowns

ATMU vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATMU drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATMU and PH.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATMU	PH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-66.92%	+38.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.40%	-17.77%	+1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-54.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.42%	-12.49%	-0.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-15.35%	+7.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.70%	4.61%	+1.09%

Volatility

ATMU vs. PH - Volatility Comparison

Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 9.82%. This indicates that ATMU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATMU	PH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.98%	9.82%	+2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.33%	17.88%	+3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.37%	30.84%	+2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.51%	28.31%	+4.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.51%	31.52%	+0.99%

Financials