SLGL vs. ERAS
SLGL (Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd.) and ERAS (Erasca, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 3 years, SLGL returned 32.44%/yr vs 77.75%/yr for ERAS. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SLGL vs. ERAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLGL achieves a 74.18% return, which is significantly lower than ERAS's 304.57% return.
SLGL
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 74.18%
- 6M
- 68.62%
- 1Y
- 907.01%
- 3Y*
- 32.44%
- 5Y*
- -11.16%
- 10Y*
- —
ERAS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 33.90%
- YTD
- 304.57%
- 6M
- 338.78%
- 1Y
- 937.93%
- 3Y*
- 77.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SLGL vs. ERAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLGL Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. | 74.18% | 353.07% | -15.83% | -75.77% | -38.38% | -40.13% |
ERAS Erasca, Inc. | 304.57% | 48.21% | 17.84% | -50.58% | -72.34% | -2.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLGL and ERAS is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.09 |
Fundamentals
SLGL:
$208.23M
ERAS:
$4.58B
SLGL:
-$0.37
ERAS:
-$0.96
SLGL:
4.05
ERAS:
11.64
SLGL:
$18.47M
ERAS:
$0.00
SLGL:
$18.47M
ERAS:
-$743.00K
SLGL:
-$2.03M
ERAS:
-$279.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLGL vs. ERAS — Risk / Return Rank
SLGL
ERAS
SLGL vs. ERAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) and Erasca, Inc. (ERAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLGL | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.74 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 25.90 | 15.94 | +9.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 59.25 | 47.91 | +11.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLGL vs. ERAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLGL drawdown since its inception was -97.87%, roughly equal to the maximum ERAS drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGL and ERAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLGL | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.87% | -95.65% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.38% | -59.46% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -90.71% | -67.68% | -23.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.20% | -38.17% | -19.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.19% | -74.47% | +10.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.43% | 19.77% | -4.34% |
Volatility
SLGL vs. ERAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. (SLGL) is 15.59%, while Erasca, Inc. (ERAS) has a volatility of 23.13%. This indicates that SLGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLGL | ERAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.59% | 23.13% | -7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 66.33% | 96.41% | -30.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.64% | 104.46% | -3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 160.47% | 83.40% | +77.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 132.33% | 83.40% | +48.93% |
Dividends
SLGL vs. ERAS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLGL nor ERAS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SLGL vs. ERAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd. and Erasca, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SLGL and ERAS have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERAS has higher volatility (23.13%) compared to SLGL (15.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGL dropped -97.87% vs ERAS's -95.65%.
SLGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.11 vs 9.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLGL and ERAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer