ATH.TO vs. OTF
ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) and OTF (Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp) are both stocks. ATH.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while OTF operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past year, ATH.TO returned 92.65% vs -24.79% for OTF. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while OTF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the OTF values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 52.92% return, which is significantly higher than OTF's -23.34% return.
ATH.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 53.35%
- YTD
- 52.92%
- 1Y
- 92.65%
- 3Y*
- 46.06%
- 5Y*
- 67.31%
- 10Y*
- 22.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.72%
OTF
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -22.32%
- YTD
- -23.34%
- 1Y
- -24.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -27.15%
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 52.92% | 24.20% |
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp | -23.34% | -8.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATH.TO and OTF is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.03 |
Fundamentals
ATH.TO:
CA$5.20B
OTF:
$4.70B
ATH.TO:
CA$0.45
OTF:
$2.10
ATH.TO:
24.08
OTF:
4.84
ATH.TO:
0.92
OTF:
0.01
ATH.TO:
3.91
OTF:
3.19
ATH.TO:
2.83
OTF:
0.62
ATH.TO:
CA$1.35B
OTF:
$1.24B
ATH.TO:
CA$518.18M
OTF:
$661.92M
ATH.TO:
CA$505.02M
OTF:
$802.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATH.TO vs. OTF — Risk / Return Rank
ATH.TO
OTF
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATH.TO | OTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.89 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | -0.98 | +5.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.96 | -1.72 | +13.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than OTF's maximum drawdown of -30.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and OTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATH.TO | OTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -30.40% | -69.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.61% | -25.41% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.24% | -29.50% | -12.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.45% | -16.92% | -56.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.78% | 14.78% | -7.00% |
Volatility
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Volatility Comparison
Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.79% compared to Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp (OTF) at 6.48%. This indicates that ATH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATH.TO | OTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.79% | 6.48% | +5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.71% | 26.30% | +5.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.43% | 32.53% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 31.71% | +17.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.51% | 31.71% | +29.80% |
Dividends
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Dividend Comparison
ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OTF Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp | 15.76% | 7.91% |
Financials
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Athabasca Oil Corporation and Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ATH.TO vs. OTF - Profitability Comparison
ATH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a gross profit of 134.91M and revenue of 377.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
OTF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ATH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported an operating income of 90.74M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.0%.
OTF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ATH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Athabasca Oil Corporation reported a net income of 46.29M and revenue of 377.38M, resulting in a net margin of 12.3%.
OTF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Blue Owl Technology Finance Corp reported a net income of 171.31M and revenue of 310.42M, resulting in a net margin of 55.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ATH.TO and OTF have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATH.TO and OTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer