PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATH.TO vs. LI.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Klepierre SA (LI.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while LI.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LI.PA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than LI.PA's 13.90% return. Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO has outperformed LI.PA with an annualized return of 21.70%, while LI.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 5.71% annualized return.


ATH.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
44.95%
6M
45.36%
1Y
81.64%
3Y*
52.56%
5Y*
59.73%
10Y*
21.70%

LI.PA

1D
-0.02%
1M
6.77%
YTD
13.90%
6M
13.86%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
30.69%
5Y*
20.98%
10Y*
5.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
44.95%31.89%27.82%73.03%102.52%600.00%-71.19%-40.40%-7.48%-47.80%
LI.PA
Klepierre SA
13.90%39.28%23.38%25.23%11.63%5.60%-38.66%22.18%-19.47%9.93%

Correlation

The correlation between ATH.TO and LI.PA is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010

0.12

The correlation between ATH.TO and LI.PA shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LI.PA
LI.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LI.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LI.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LI.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LI.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LI.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Klepierre SA (LI.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATH.TOLI.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

1.73

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

3.54

+8.76

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the LI.PA Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATH.TO and LI.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than LI.PA's maximum drawdown of -72.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and LI.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATH.TOLI.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.41%

-72.60%

-26.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.50%

-11.69%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-12.74%

-12.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.37%

-35.56%

-7.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.63%

-69.18%

-25.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.24%

-0.02%

-45.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.56%

-22.04%

-51.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

5.75%

+0.91%

Volatility

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Volatility Comparison

Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to Klepierre SA (LI.PA) at 5.05%. This indicates that ATH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LI.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATH.TOLI.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.89%

5.05%

+7.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.02%

15.01%

+17.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.70%

18.63%

+19.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.58%

28.57%

+21.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.54%

36.96%

+24.58%

Dividends

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Dividend Comparison

ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LI.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LI.PA
Klepierre SA
5.05%5.48%6.47%7.09%7.90%0.00%5.98%3.10%7.27%4.96%4.55%3.90%

Financials

ATH.TO vs. LI.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Athabasca Oil Corporation and Klepierre SA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ATH.TO values in CAD, LI.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


ATH.TO and LI.PA have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATH.TO and LI.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer