ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO
ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) and LBS.TO (Life & Banc Split Corp.) are both stocks. ATH.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while LBS.TO operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO returned 21.70%/yr vs 30.61%/yr for LBS.TO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly lower than LBS.TO's 92.41% return. Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO has underperformed LBS.TO with an annualized return of 21.70%, while LBS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 30.61% annualized return.
ATH.TO
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -6.60%
- YTD
- 44.95%
- 6M
- 45.36%
- 1Y
- 81.64%
- 3Y*
- 52.56%
- 5Y*
- 59.73%
- 10Y*
- 21.70%
LBS.TO
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 32.16%
- YTD
- 92.41%
- 6M
- 90.38%
- 1Y
- 162.44%
- 3Y*
- 60.88%
- 5Y*
- 39.30%
- 10Y*
- 30.61%
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 44.95% | 31.89% | 27.82% | 73.03% | 102.52% | 600.00% | -71.19% | -40.40% | -7.48% | -47.80% |
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 92.41% | 55.41% | 38.56% | 10.41% | 0.97% | 65.80% | -3.16% | 44.97% | -20.15% | 19.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATH.TO and LBS.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ATH.TO and LBS.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ATH.TO:
CA$4.95B
LBS.TO:
CA$682.46M
ATH.TO:
CA$0.45
LBS.TO:
CA$8.45
ATH.TO:
22.82
LBS.TO:
1.57
ATH.TO:
0.87
LBS.TO:
0.04
ATH.TO:
3.71
LBS.TO:
4.03
ATH.TO:
2.68
LBS.TO:
1.01
ATH.TO:
CA$1.35B
LBS.TO:
CA$169.21M
ATH.TO:
CA$518.18M
LBS.TO:
CA$160.11M
ATH.TO:
CA$505.02M
LBS.TO:
CA$425.46M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATH.TO
LBS.TO
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATH.TO | LBS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.87 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 6.43 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.30 | 28.45 | -16.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than LBS.TO's maximum drawdown of -83.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and LBS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATH.TO | LBS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -83.14% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.50% | -25.43% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | -34.23% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.37% | -35.44% | -7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.63% | -63.25% | -31.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.24% | -1.34% | -43.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.56% | -11.78% | -61.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.66% | 5.73% | +0.93% |
Volatility
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO - Volatility Comparison
Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Life & Banc Split Corp. (LBS.TO) have volatilities of 12.89% and 12.99%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATH.TO | LBS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.89% | 12.99% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.02% | 42.15% | -10.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.70% | 45.20% | -7.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.58% | 30.58% | +19.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.54% | 39.24% | +22.30% |
Dividends
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO - Dividend Comparison
ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LBS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LBS.TO Life & Banc Split Corp. | 7.21% | 12.92% | 17.12% | 19.61% | 17.88% | 15.33% | 7.16% | 19.39% | 23.12% | 15.52% | 15.92% | 19.20% |
Financials
ATH.TO vs. LBS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Athabasca Oil Corporation and Life & Banc Split Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ATH.TO and LBS.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATH.TO and LBS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer