ATH.TO vs. AOD

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) and AOD (Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund) are both stocks. ATH.TO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while AOD operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO returned 21.70%/yr vs 14.42%/yr for AOD. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATH.TO vs. AOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while AOD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AOD values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than AOD's 16.68% return. Over the past 10 years, ATH.TO has outperformed AOD with an annualized return of 21.70%, while AOD has yielded a comparatively lower 14.42% annualized return.

ATH.TO

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -6.60%
• YTD: 44.95%
• 6M: 45.36%
• 1Y: 81.64%
• 3Y*: 52.56%
• 5Y*: 59.73%
• 10Y*: 21.70%

AOD

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 2.86%
• YTD: 16.68%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 38.65%
• 3Y*: 23.54%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: 14.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATH.TO vs. AOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation	44.95%	31.89%	27.82%	73.03%	102.52%	600.00%	-71.19%	-40.40%	-7.48%	-47.80%
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	16.68%	26.11%	25.86%	9.97%	-11.90%	23.74%	5.56%	29.28%	-10.70%	26.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ATH.TO and AOD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.12
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2010	0.22

Over the past year, the correlation between ATH.TO and AOD has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.22, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) ATH.TO : CA$1.35B AOD : $93.67M
Gross Profit (TTM) ATH.TO : CA$518.18M AOD : $252.71M
EBITDA (TTM) ATH.TO : CA$505.02M AOD : $55.11M

Return for Risk

ATH.TO vs. AOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATH.TO

ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 89
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

AOD

AOD Risk / Return Rank: 87
AOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AOD Omega Ratio Rank: 90
AOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AOD Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATH.TO vs. AOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATH.TO	AOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	2.41	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.24	-0.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.44	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	2.47	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.30	10.44	+1.87

ATH.TO vs. AOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the AOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATH.TO and AOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATH.TO vs. AOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than AOD's maximum drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and AOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATH.TO	AOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.41%	-67.89%	-31.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.50%	-15.71%	-4.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.62%	-15.71%	-9.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.37%	-23.44%	-19.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.63%	-39.49%	-55.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-45.24%	0.00%	-45.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.56%	-25.21%	-48.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.66%	3.71%	+2.95%

Volatility

ATH.TO vs. AOD - Volatility Comparison

Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) has a higher volatility of 12.89% compared to Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) at 5.44%. This indicates that ATH.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATH.TO	AOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.89%	5.44%	+7.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.02%	14.03%	+17.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.70%	16.16%	+21.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.58%	17.42%	+32.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.54%	19.14%	+42.40%

Dividends

ATH.TO vs. AOD - Dividend Comparison

ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.81%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOD Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund	11.81%	12.00%	10.73%	8.56%	8.85%	6.75%	7.80%	7.71%	9.57%	7.29%	9.10%	8.93%
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATH.TO and AOD in my portfolio?

ATH.TO and AOD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.