ATFV vs. SMST

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

ATFV (Alger 35 ETF) and SMST (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATFV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while SMST is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. ATFV is passively managed, while SMST is actively managed. Over the past year, ATFV returned 38.67% vs 223.04% for SMST. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. ATFV charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SMST.

Performance

ATFV vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATFV achieves a 14.71% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -31.56% return.

ATFV

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 2.69%
• 6M: 12.01%
• YTD: 14.71%
• 1Y: 38.67%
• 3Y*: 36.93%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: —

SMST

• 1D: -1.67%
• 1M: 37.17%
• 6M: -24.18%
• YTD: -31.56%
• 1Y: 223.04%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATFV vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	14.71%	38.20%	18.78%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	-31.56%	-44.36%	-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ATFV and SMST is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.46

Return for Risk

ATFV vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATFV

ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 54
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SMST

SMST Risk / Return Rank: 53
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 58
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATFV vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATFV	SMST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.54	1.37	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.22	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.29	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	2.39	-0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.01	4.64	+2.37

ATFV vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATFV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATFV and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATFV vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATFV drawdown since its inception was -45.34%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATFV and SMST.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATFV	SMST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.34%	-99.25%	+53.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.29%	-85.39%	+67.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.19%	-97.31%	+93.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.56%	-90.88%	+73.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.55%	43.98%	-38.43%

Volatility

ATFV vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) is 10.52%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 56.47%. This indicates that ATFV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATFV	SMST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.52%	56.47%	-45.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.19%	135.94%	-115.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.28%	149.09%	-123.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.08%	167.87%	-140.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.80%	167.87%	-141.07%

ATFV vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATFV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ATFV vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

ATFV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ATFV Alger 35 ETF	0.18%	0.20%	0.16%	0.01%	0.06%
SMST Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATFV and SMST in my portfolio?

ATFV and SMST have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATFV or SMST?

SMST has higher volatility (56.47%) compared to ATFV (10.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATFV dropped -45.34% vs SMST's -99.25%.

Which ETF is better, ATFV or SMST?

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 223.04% vs 38.67% for ATFV. On fees, ATFV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ATFV has been the lower-risk option at 10.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ATFV or SMST?

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 223.04% return vs 38.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ATFV or SMST?

ATFV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ATFV or SMST?

ATFV has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

What is the main difference between ATFV and SMST?

ATFV is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alger Group Holdings LLC and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ATFV and 1.29% for SMST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ATFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.